• Ingen resultater fundet

The topic for the workshop

N/A
N/A
Info
Hent
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Del "The topic for the workshop"

Copied!
13
0
0

Indlæser.... (se fuldtekst nu)

Hele teksten

(1)

Ingrid Jepsen,

Midwife, lecturer, University College Northern Denmark, the midwifery department

How to transfer knowledge of philosophy of science from theory to practice

(2)

Assisted by:

• Annegrethe Nielsen

• Grit Niklasson

(3)

The topic for the workshop

The workshop will be an

illustration of how we teach philosophy of science

in the beginning of the midwifery study

What is philosophy of science…? and what’s the use of it?

Students a

ttude…

(4)

What do we do?

The Midwifery students

are introduced to natural

science, humanities and

social sciences by three

different teachers. (2 x 45

min for each “science”).

(5)

Then we make a work-shop (3 x 45 min) to try to :

• Make the students understand the difference between the sciences

• Show how philosophy of science can make sense in relation to clinical practice

• Show what questions you ask according to a scientific

perspective

(6)

The students receive the questions for the workshop the day before the

workshop Workshop

The students are at first divided into 3 groups: natural science, humanities and social science.

Each group has a teacher as a

supervisor (the teacher who has taught philosophy of science)

Each group is told to watch a video focusing on their specific scientific perspective (and the questions).

The students watch the video (45 min)

V id eo

Natural science

Humanities

Social science

(7)

• Together with the three

teachers/ supervisors the class splits up into three groups to work with the questions

according to their ”science” (45 min)

• Finally the students prepare and make presentations for each other in the class room

-and they share and discuss their answers (45 min)

(8)

And now you are going to try it!

(9)

What are we going to do together?

“Count to three” to get your group allocation

1. Humanities 2. Natural science 3. Social science

A brief information about what in general constitutes the chosen sciences is handed out together with the questions for the video

Watch the video all together

Answer the questions in groups (together with the supervisor)

Presentation in plenum: You present your answers to the questions

(10)

What is natural science, humanities and social sciences?

(Holm AB, Philosophy of science, 2013, Frederiksberg, samfundslitteratur.)

Natural science

• Scientific knowledge is acquired through the systematic gathering of empirical data and only theories derived from such data can be

considered scientific (positivism)

• Scientific true theories are verifiable

• Only empirical and measurable “things” count

• Based on natural sciences

• Normative

• Neutrality, unprejudiced researcher

• Objectivism, an object is the sum of our sensory perception of it

• Observations: thorough, systematic, logically stringent, aimed at a particular target, generalizations

(11)

What is science, humanities and social sciences?

(Holm AB, Philosophy of science, 2013, Frederiksberg, samfundslitteratur.)

Humanities

• All expressions of human life are the object of humanities

• The interpretative way of human sciences in principle constitutes a never- ending process

• Working with human beings; there are no correct answers and there is no absolute truth

• Understanding, but complete understanding will never be reached

• The researcher works within a framework of understanding

• More in common with dialogue than experiments and observation

• Individuality

• Experiences are in focus

• Knowledge in depth and not in general

(12)

What is science, humanities and social sciences?

(Holm AB, Philosophy of science, 2013, Frederiksberg, samfundslitteratur.)

Social sciences

All social sciences must be based on an ide of what a society is and what characterizes one’s social interaction

Social life

Family

Network

Problems and methods vary greatly according to which sociologist you are inspired:

- Study social facts not individuals: religion, morals, language (Durkheim)

- Class society, positions, capitalism, power struggles and conflicts of interests (Marx)

- Individual behaviour (motives)(Weber)

Being critical of the ethical or political consequenses of science is important. The researcher: critical of the role their research plays in society

Uses different research-methods

(13)

Questions to answer in groups

Find examples in the video where you can see your scientific perspective represented

What kind of questions are you able to ask from your ”scientific”

perspective? - Choose one of your questions

What kind of study/research/methods would you choose to get answers to your question?

Try to find some arguments according to your “science”for the truth of this knowledge?

What is the use of your chosen research/investigation?

Referencer

RELATEREDE DOKUMENTER

Firstly, the teachers reflect didactically on how to teach students to study a given disci- pline, and by implementing the Takeaway Teaching themes they make teaching and learning

The creation and distribution of collective wisdom though narrative production, dissemination, and analysis will be key to the survival of the humanities and social sciences and

(a) each element has an influence factor on electrical values, such as voltages, power flows, rotor angle, in the TSO's control area greater than common contingency influence

Simultaneously, development began on the website, as we wanted users to be able to use the site to upload their own material well in advance of opening day, and indeed to work

We are looking at three types of live streams by young male hosts (= streamers) on Douyin to analyze the motivations of female viewers to watch and make virtual gifts to the hosts

Then, all the articles were coded in three areas: academic field (STEM, Humanities and Social Sciences, or Medicine), theoretical approach (prescriptive or descriptive), and themes

RDIs will through SMEs collaboration in ECOLABNET get challenges and cases to solve, and the possibility to collaborate with other experts and IOs to build up better knowledge

Hvis jordemoderen skal anvende empowerment som strategi i konsultationen, skal hun derfor tage udgangspunkt i parrets ressourcer og støtte dem i at styrke disse.. Fokus på