• Ingen resultater fundet

School differences in the degree to which students feel recognized by their teachers

N/A
N/A
Info
Hent
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Del "School differences in the degree to which students feel recognized by their teachers"

Copied!
38
0
0

Indlæser.... (se fuldtekst nu)

Hele teksten

(1)

Danish University Colleges

School differences in the degree to which students feel recognized by their teachers

Vieluf, Svenja; Roczen, Nina; Rozman, Mojca; Kozina, Ana; Nielsen, Birgitte Lund; Puzic, Sasa; Sälzer, Christine; Rasmusson, Maria

Publication date:

2021

Link to publication

Citation for pulished version (APA):

Vieluf, S., Roczen, N., Rozman, M., Kozina, A., Nielsen, B. L., Puzic, S., Sälzer, C., & Rasmusson, M. (2021).

School differences in the degree to which students feel recognized by their teachers. 1-5. Paper presented at EARLI 2021, EDUCATION AND CITIZENSHIP: Learning and Instruction and the Shaping of Futures,

Gothenburg, Sweden.

General rights

Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.

• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.

• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal

Download policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

(2)

Vieluf, S., Roczen, N., Rožman, M., Kozina, A.,

Nielsen, B.L., Puzić, S., Sälzer, C., & Rasmusson, M.

Presentation at the 19th Biennial Conference of the EARLI – online - August, 26th 2021

School differences in the degree to which students feel

recognized by their teachers

(3)

Teacher-student relations

• A positive quality of teacher-student relations has been shown to be associated with students‘ learning

motivation and learning gains (Kunter & Tsai, 2008;

Wang & Holcombe, 2010).

• Normative recognition theories (Fraser, 1995; Honneth, 1995; Taylor, 1992) further emphasize the role of social relations for the development of identity.

(4)

Recognition

Three modes of recognition (Honneth, 1996; p. 129):

1. Emotional support

receiving unconditional affection and care

ð self-

confidence

(5)

Recognition

Three modes of recognition (Honneth, 1996; p. 129):

1. Emotional support

receiving unconditional affection and care

ð self-

confidence

2. Cognitive respect

bearing rights and duties that apply to all members of a collective

ð self-respect

(6)

Recognition

Three modes of recognition (Honneth, 1996; p. 129):

1. Emotional support

receiving unconditional affection and care

ð self-

confidence

2. Cognitive respect

bearing rights and duties that apply to all members of a collective

ð self-respect

3. Social esteem

experiencing that the individual characteristics are valued in light of common practice

ð self-esteem

(7)

Recognition in Schools

Teachers‘ recognition for students (Helsper, 2001):

1. Emotional support

2. Cognitive respect

3. Social esteem

(8)

Recognition in Schools

Teachers‘ recognition for students (Helsper, 2001):

1. Emotional support

positive, friendly, open and interested stance

2. Cognitive respect

3. Social esteem

(9)

Recognition in Schools

Teachers‘ recognition for students (Helsper, 2001):

1. Emotional support

positive, friendly, open and interested stance

2. Cognitive respect

equal treatment and equal opportunities for participation and learning

3. Social esteem

(10)

Recognition in Schools

Teachers‘ recognition for students (Helsper, 2001):

1. Emotional support

positive, friendly, open and interested stance

2. Cognitive respect

equal treatment and equal opportunities for participation and learning

3. Social esteem valuing students‘ achievements,

characteristics and self-presentations

(11)

Recognition in Schools

Teachers‘ recognition for students (Helsper, 2001):

1. Emotional support

positive, friendly, open and interested stance

2. cognitive respect

equal treatment and equal opportunities for participation and learning

3. Social esteem teachers show that they value students‘

achievements, characteristics and self- presentations

• Teachers are often perceived as friendly and caring (e.g., OECD, 2019; Prengel, 2013)

• Yet, misrecognition is also common: e.g. insult, ridicule, yelling, punishing, threatening (e.g.

Prengel, 2013)

(12)

Recognition in Schools

Teachers‘ recognition for students (Helsper, 2001):

1. emotional support

teachers have a positive, friendly, open and interested stance towards students

2. cognitive respect

teachers treat all students equally and give them equal opportunities for participation and learning

3. Social esteem teachers show that they value students‘

achievements, characteristics and self- presentations

• Teacher‘s pet (Babad, 1995)

• Possiilities for participation in class depend on teacher expectations (Brophy & Good, 1974;

Wang et al., 2018)

(13)

Recognition in Schools

Teachers‘ recognition for students (Helsper, 2001):

1. emotional support

teachers have a positive, friendly, open and interested stance towards students

2. cognitive respect

teachers treat all students equally and give them equal opportunities for participation and learning

3. Social esteem teachers show that they value students‘

achievements, characteristics and self- presentations

• Selection function (e.g., Fend, 2008)

• Grading (e.g., Breidenstein, 2018)

• Hidden curricula (e.g. Apple & Kind, 1983)

(14)

Differences between and within schools

School cultures:

• specific conditions and policies

• ideals,

• routinized interaction styles, styles of teaching etc.

ð consequences for recognition patterns

(Helsper, Böhme, & Kramer, 2013)

(15)

Differences between Schools

(16)

Research Questions

1. Are there differences between schools with regard to the degree to which students feel recognized by their teachers?

2. Are there differences between schools with regard to the size of inequalities in the extent to which students feel recognized by their teachers?

3. Are the school differences related to teacher’s

awareness of societal inequalities as one aspect of school cultures?

(17)

Method

Data from:

(18)

Method

Sample:

• 788 students

• 335 teachers

• in 36 schools

• in 3 European countries (pooled data)

(19)

Student Questionnaire:

Recognition/misrecognition by teachers in the mode of:

Emotional support – pos.: 5 items, e.g. „My teachers care about me.”

Emotional support – neg. : 3 items, e.g. „A teacher said something insulting to me in front of others.”

Cognitive respect – neg. : 3 items, e.g. “A teacher disciplined me more harshly than other students.”

Social esteem – pos. : 3 items, e.g. “My teachers appreciate my competences.”

Method

Assessment of „Teachers‘ recognition of students“

(20)

Teacher Questionnaire

Awareness of social inequalities:

4 items from the Critical Consciousness Scale, Subscale “perceived inequality” (Diener et al., 2017), e.g. “Poor children have fewer chances to get a good high school education.”

Method

Operationalization of „Teachers‘ diversity awareness“

(21)

Analysis:

1. Descriptive analysis at the school level (n = 36) 2. Correlations at the school level (n = 36)

Method

(22)

Results

1. Are there differences between schools with regard to the degree to which students feel recognized by their teachers?

2. Are there differences between schools with regard to the size of inequalities in the extent to which

students feel recognized by their teachers?

(23)

Results

In our sample there is no school, where every student feels recognized by every teacher in every mode.

(24)

Results

But there are schools in which many students feel well recognized and others where this is not the case:

Scale n min max mean SD

recognition

emotional support 36 2.23 3.96 2.99 .30

(25)

Results

But there are schools in which many students feel well recognized and others where this is not the case:

Scale n min max mean SD

recognition

emotional support 36 2.23 3.96 2.99 .30

social esteem 36 1.98 3.59 2.83 .33

(26)

Results

But there are schools in which many students feel well recognized and others where this is not the case:

Scale n min max mean SD

recognition

emotional support 36 2.23 3.96 2.99 .30

social esteem 36 1.98 3.59 2.83 .33

misrecognition

ridiculed, insulted or yelled at

36 1.04 1.71 1.37 .17

treated unfairly 36 1.31 2.18 1.66 .19

(27)

Results

SD for Scale n min max mean

recognition

emotional support 36 0.39 1.09 0.67

social esteem 36 0.45 1.01 0.76

misrecognition

ridiculed, insulted or yelled at

36 0.11 1.07 0.55

treated unfairly 36 0.38 1.30 0.64

In some schools teachers‘ recognition of students is distributed more equally than in others:

(28)

Results

SD for Scale n min max mean

recognition

emotional support 36 0.39 1.09 0.67

social esteem 36 0.45 1.01 0.76

misrecognition

ridiculed, insulted or yelled at

36 0.11 1.07 0.55

treated unfairly 36 0.38 1.30 0.64

In some schools teachers‘ recognition of students is distributed more equally than in others:

(29)

Results

In some schools teachers‘ recognition of students is distributed more equally than in others:

(30)

Results

3. Are the school differences related to teacher’s

awareness of societal inequalities as one aspect of school cultures?

(31)

Awareness of social inequalities

recognition

emotional support .18

social esteem .21

misrecognition

ridiculed, insulted or yelled at -.15

treated unfairly .09

Teachers‘ attitudes towards diversity are not correlated with teachers‘ recognition of students (average scores):

Results

(32)

Awareness of social inequalities

recognition

emotional support -.40**

social esteem -.38*

misrecognition

ridiculed, insulted or yelled at -.14

treated unfairly .26

Teachers‘ recognition of students is more equally

distributed in schools where teachers are more aware of social inequalities:

Results

(33)

In accordance with previous empirical findings (e.g., OECD; 2019; Prengel. 2013), students in our study

• felt mostly well supported and esteemed by their teachers.

• reported only few instances of negative treatment.

Yet, often some students felt less supported than others and also reported more negative experiences with

teachers in their schools (see also Ba b ad, 1995;

Brophy & Good, 1974; Wang et al., 2018)

Discussion

(34)

In accordance with school culture theory (e.g. Helsper et al., 2008) we observed differences between schools:

• In some schools most (or even all) students felt recognized by most of their teachers

• In other schools students generally felt less recognized by their teachers.

• In again other schools, differences between students were large: Some felt recognized, others did not.

Discussion

(35)

Even though…

… conflict is generally inherent to social interactions

… the structure and function of schooling as an institution in modern societies appears to intensify struggles for recognition, …

… still schools and/or individual teachers within schools appear to have some scope with regard to how they

address the resulting conflicts and how they treat the different students they teach.

Discussion

(36)

Teachers‘ awareness of social inequalities appears to be associated with a more equal distribution of

teachers‘ recognition of students.

Discussion

(37)

Discussion

Future research:

Can these school differences really be interpreted as reflecting school cultures?

• Differences between schools or between classes? Which role do students prior relationship experiences play?

• Do teachers‘ beliefs reflect differences in

school ideals and visions, self-presentations, policies and practices?

(38)

Thank you.

Referencer

RELATEREDE DOKUMENTER

K-12 public school teachers are provided little if any voice in the construction of education policy. The absence of teachers’ expertise in policy decisions can be attributed to

maripaludis Mic1c10, ToF-SIMS and EDS images indicated that in the column incubated coupon the corrosion layer does not contain carbon (Figs. 6B and 9 B) whereas the corrosion

Severely disabled students at upper secondary school or in grades 7- 10 of comprehensive school are entitled to the assistive devices required for their studies (such as computers

To quality assure the incoming foreign students’ stay at the School of Architecture, students complete an evaluation form at the end of their stay, which provides the basis for

The results on group differences in school inputs show that while immigrant students are favoured compared to native students with respect to traditional school resources (e.g.

Because these differences between the Danish and Brazilian contexts, we are not looking at how DLPs are used in the teaching-learning process, but what DLPs have before teachers,

This project aims to support primary school teachers in enhancing social inclusion in the classroom, particularly students with migrant and refugee backgrounds and to help them

Figure 1: Overview of differences in pain thresholds and related measures. A) differences related to increased physical activity level (men and women), B) differences related to