• Ingen resultater fundet

PhotoSolar PowerShade and MicroShade

N/A
N/A
Info
Hent
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Del "PhotoSolar PowerShade and MicroShade"

Copied!
21
0
0

Indlæser.... (se fuldtekst nu)

Hele teksten

(1)

Energy-efficient building PowerShade

MicroShade

(2)

PhotoSolar PowerShade and MicroShade

Søren Jensen, R&D engineer, PhotoSolar ApS

Contents

• Introducing the PhotoSolar concept

• Introduction to the products

• Advantages of PowerShade

• Advantages of MicroShade

• Pictures from pilot installations

• The Nordea case simulation

• More information

(3)

Conventional solar shading

- and the PhotoSolar alternative

Direct solar irra diation is shaded

Outview is allowed – transparent appearance

Enlarged picture of micro structured shading foil between sheet glass.

Exterior shading system

Solar control glass

Conventional solar shading:

(Exterior lamellas or screens)

• Efficient

• Expensive

• Cleaning and maintenance issues

The PhotoSolar concept:

(Micro-structured shading embedded in front glass)

• Same efficiency as exterior solutions

• Competitive price

• Less cleaning and no maintenance

(4)

PowerShade and MicroShade

Product Introduction

PowerShade IG – Combined solar shading and transparent photovoltaics

• Shades excess solar radiation from the facade and converts to green power

• Novel and patented photovoltaic technology with improved efficiency

• Fully integrated in double or triple layer glazing

• Strong shading character

MicroShade IG – Glazing-integrated solar shading

• Efficient shading – may replace exterior shading devices

• No maintenance and reduced need for facade cleaning

• Robust structure

(5)

Advantages of PowerShade IG

• High Efficiency – The 3D PV technology provides more power than 2D PV modules with same transparency.

• Neutral in colour – no colouring of the transmitted light.

Reflected colour is dark gray or black (outside view).

• Customized design – Size and module layout is customer specified. Full or partial coverage of glass and gradient modules are possible.

• Electrical output – 50 kWh/m2 per year when mounted in vertical facade.

• Simple installation and robust products – no moving parts, sensitive parts are protected by glass structure.

• Clean technology – no hazardous waste.

Electrical effect on facade - comparison Conversion efficiency: 7%

Vertical installation Beam intensity: 1000W/m2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Solar angle (degrees)

Maximum effect (W/m2)

PowerShade 3D - T=0.52 Reference 2D - T=0.52 Reference 2D - T=0.1

(6)

Advantages of MicroShade IG

• Robust design – shading integrated in glazing

• Neutral in colour – no colouring of the transmitted light.

Reflected colour is dark gray or black (out side view).

• Customized design – Size and module layout is customer specified. Full or partial coverage of glass and gradient modules are possible.

• Progressive shading – effective g-value in the range from 0.12 to 0.36. Low in summer – high in winter.

• Simple installation and robust products – no moving parts, sensitive parts are protected by glass structure.

• Clean technology – no hazardous waste.

• Replaces exterior shadings – no maintenance and less cleaning.

0 0 ,05 0,1 0 ,15 0,2 0 ,25 0,3 0 ,35 0,4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Month (1-12)

Average g-value

MicroShade Type A

Solar control glass (g0=0.34)

Weather data for Copenhagen – MeteoNorm 4.0

(7)

Pilot installations and testing - MicroShade

• Test programme – thermal performance has been tested by the Danish Technological Institute in full-scale installations for more than 18 months.

• Manufacturing technology has been tested by independent glazing manufacturers with succes.

• EN1279 testing in progress – final approval expected in December 2008.

• 25 m2 of prototype glazing has been installed and subjected to visual judgement by more than 100 independent valuators.

• MicroShade IG is ready for sale – project orders are accepted by PhotoSolar and initial glass industry partners.

(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)

Shading and solar power envelope

Nordea case

(13)

Case study – The Nordea building

Simulation of the Nordea building: Teknologisk Institut – Industry and Energy, University of Strathclyde;

supported by Eltra through PSO R&D funds.

Printed glass lamellas

Double pane window, Suncool HP

Inside Outside

Double pane window, PS5060 PV module used as front layer

Inside Outside

(14)

The existing solar shading

• Exterior solar shades in combination with solar control glass.

• Exterior solar shades are movable in 7 steps, controlled automatically.

• Solar control glass is state of the art - Pilkington Suncool HP Brilliant.

(15)

The PhotoSolar alternative

Double pane window, PS5060 PV module used as front layer

Inside Outside

PS5060

(16)

Cooling need and electrical power production, yearly

Simulation made by Teknologisk Institut BuildVISION & University of Strathclyde using the ESP-r simulation platform.

Copenhagen

-20000 -15000 -10000 -5000 0 5000 10000

Existing PS5060 Suncool

Electrical power (kWh/year)

Cooling Production

Palermo

-20000 -15000 -10000 -5000 0 5000 10000 15000

Existing PS5060 Suncool

Electrical power (kWh/year)

Cooling Production

(17)

Room temperature – June 3 (Copenhagen)

18 20 22 24 26 28 30

0 0 h 0 3 0 1 h 1 3 0 2 h 2 3 0 3 h 3 3 0 4 h 4 3 0 5 h 5 3 0 7 h 0 2 0 8 h 1 2 0 9 h 2 3 1 0 h 3 3 1 1 h 4 2 1 2 h 5 3 1 4 h 0 3 1 5 h 1 2 1 6 h 2 3 1 7 h 3 2 1 8 h 4 3 1 9 h 5 3 2 1 h 0 2 2 2 h 1 3 2 3 h 2 3

Tim e

In d o o r te m p e ra tu re ( °C )

Existing Float Suncool

PhotoSolar 5060

Simulation made by Teknologisk Institut BuildVISION & University of Strathclyde using the ESP-r simulation platform.

(18)

Copenhagen

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Distance from facade (m )

Thermal input (kWh/m2)

Existing PS5060 Suncool

Comfort profile

Palermo

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Distance from facade (m)

Thermal input (kWh/m2)

Existing PS5060 Suncool

Simulation made by Teknologisk Institut BuildVISION & University of Strathclyde using the ESP-r simulation platform.

Thermal energy flux into the building

(kWh/m2) vs. distance from facade

(19)

Direct conclusions of the Nordea case

The shading efficiency of PowerShade and MicroShade nearly equals the existing solution on the building in which both

external blinds and solar control glass is used.

PowerShade and MicroShade provides more shading than solar control glass – and may replace exterior shading devices.

The temperature profile is equal to that found for the existing solution.

The comfort profile is identical to that of the existing solution and better than solar control glass.

The potential power production of the PowerShade module

approximates the need for electrical energy to drive the cooling

of the building.

(20)

More information - www.photosolar.dk

Downloads currently available

• General information – MicroShade IG (Danish)

• Technical data sheet – MicroShade IG (Danish)

• Be06 calculation routine - MicroShade IG (Danish)

(21)

PhotoSolar ApS Gregersensvej 1 2630 Taastrup Denmark

phone: +45 22 67 36 13

fax: +45 72 20 32 03

info@photosolar.dk

www.photosolar.dk

Referencer

RELATEREDE DOKUMENTER

land type (high annual precipitation) with a temperature profile that - apart from the upper metres - is practically isothermal and very close to 0°, i.c. belonging to

It is found that singular de is used with both generic and specific reference, and that interlocutors may use singular de to avoid indexing gender and orienting to it as a

The reason why the max room temperature is lower with closed doors than with open doors in experiment 3 and 9 is that the control strategy here forces the windows

Freedom in commons brings ruin to all.” In terms of National Parks – an example with much in common with museums – Hardin diagnoses that being ‘open to all, without limits’

(a) each element has an influence factor on electrical values, such as voltages, power flows, rotor angle, in the TSO's control area greater than common contingency influence

If the glass is subjected to high pressure at a temperature when the treatment time is above the structural relaxation time and subsequently frozen-in under

In one case, an informant said that the person to whom she had paid PHP 125,000 (corresponding to approx. EUR 1,846) in the Philippines was a former au pair for her host family.

To sum up, the supply temperature control strategy proposed in this paper provides a guide for the transformation of existing heat exchanger stations to low-temperature