• Ingen resultater fundet

Serving a high meat protein lunch reduces subsequent energy intake at dinner:

N/A
N/A
Info
Hent
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Del "Serving a high meat protein lunch reduces subsequent energy intake at dinner:"

Copied!
1
0
0

Indlæser.... (se fuldtekst nu)

Hele teksten

(1)

Results

The lunch meal had a significant effect on the ad libitum dinner energy intake (p=0.0182).

The high meat protein lunch resulted in a lower energy intake than the normal lunch (-250 kJ).

A tendency towards a significantly reduced dai- ly energy intake was found when the high meat protein lunch was consumed (p=0.0561).

No significant effects could be demonstrated on hunger or fullness ratings. One exception was after the lunch, as the high meat protein lunch decreased fullness (p=0.0460).

Table 1. The served lunch meals and their nutritional composition (mean values).

Figure 1. Effects of lunch meal (high meat protein lunch

vs. normal lunch) on energy intake. A significant difference (p<0.05) between the lunch meals is indicated by a *.

Figure 2. Hunger and fullness ratings (means ± SE) for the two lunch meals.

Contact

Ursula Kehlet

Email: unk@dti.dk

Phone: +45 72 20 29 01

Serving a high meat protein lunch reduces subsequent

energy intake at dinner:

– a randomised trial conducted in a real-life setting

Ursula Kehlet

1

, Per B.Brockhoff

2

, Mari Ann Tørngren

1

and Margit Dall Aaslyng

1

Objectives

To investigate how high protein meals containing pork affect appetite and energy intake when con- sumed in a real-life setting.

Materials and Methods

• Crossover study

• 134 students (15-16 years old)

• Conducted at a local boarding school

1) Danish Meat Research Institute, DK-4000 Roskilde, www.DMRI.com 2) Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby

#112

Appetite 1 Appetite 2 Appetite 3 Appetite 4 Appetite 5

12:00 12:30 15:30 18:00 18:30

LUNCH

High meat protein Normal

DINNER Ad libitum

High-meat protein lunch Normal lunch

Pork stroganoff with mashed

potatoes and salad Pork stroganoff with mashed potatoes and salad

Energy: 2235 kJ Protein: 36 E%

Carbohydrate: 33 E%

Fat: 31 E%

Energy: 2480 kJ Protein: 17 E%

Carboydrate: 51 E%

Fat: 32 E%

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Ad libitum meal Daily energy intake

kJ

High meat protein lunch Normal lunch

*

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

12:00

before lunch 12:30

after lunch 15:30 18:00

before dinner 18:30 after dinner

VAS (0-150 mm)

Hunger High meat protein lunch Normal lunch

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

12:00

before lunch 12:30

after lunch 15:30 18:00

before dinner 18:30 after dinner

VAS (0-150 mm)

Fullness High meat protein lunch Normal lunch

*

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

12:00

before lunch 12:30

after lunch 15:30 18:00

before dinner 18:30 after dinner

VAS (0-150 mm)

Hunger High meat protein lunch Normal lunch

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

12:00

before lunch 12:30

after lunch 15:30 18:00

before dinner 18:30 after dinner

VAS (0-150 mm)

Fullness High meat protein lunch Normal lunch

*

Conclusion

High protein lunch meals with pork suppress

energy intake at dinner

Referencer

RELATEREDE DOKUMENTER

However, building systems provide a significant increase in the energy efficiency of the building and the heating and cooling energy demand are associated with high energy

Almost half of the Member States have a relatively high dependence on fossil fuels (more than 70% of fossil energy carriers in the national energy mix.) Only four countries

The attitude towards functional meat products of Danish consumers was investigated by analyzing data from two questionnaire surveys (n=1499 and n=157). The Danish

Experimental research on a kind of novel high temperature phase change storage heater. Energy Conversion and Management,

On a national level, a high level of com- petition without obvious dominant players was found (Herfindahl- Hirschman Index between 0.107 and 0.013). When accounting for

Although a significant influence of preservatives could be demonstrated, the catch in traps with benzoic acid and 0.5% forrnaldehyde was not very different from

Meat packaging shelf life trial on fresh and processed meat products. Discoloration of cooked cured meat products

The high total moisture loss of the reference samples was especially because of a significantly higher (P &lt; 0.001) moisture loss during cooking (green part of the