• Ingen resultater fundet

Long Distance travel 2010-11

N/A
N/A
Info
Hent
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Del "Long Distance travel 2010-11"

Copied!
22
0
0

Indlæser.... (se fuldtekst nu)

Hele teksten

(1)

Long Distance travel 2010-11

Linda Christensen & Mette Knudsen

(2)

DTU Transport, Technical University of Denmark

Overview of the presentation

1. How do we define Long distance travel 1. Definitions

2. Available surveys

2. How much do Danes travel on long distance travel 3. What is the climate effect?

4. What is the development?

2 Long Distance Travel 2010-11 26. August 2014

(3)

Definition of Long Distance travel

Two traditional possibilities:

• Tours longer than 100 km one-way – Tradition in transport literature

• Journeys with overnight stay – Tradition in tourism literature Our choice:

• Journeys with overnight stay – Infrequent travel

– Bringing luggage

Practical solution in surveys for ‘infrequent travel’

• Included

– All business trips independent of frequency

– Visits to second homes when still living at home

• Not included – Commuting

– Visits to second homes more frequent than once a week

– Visits to friends and relatives when more frequent than 6 times

(4)

DTU Transport, Technical University of Denmark

Two surveys – not designed for the definition

• TU 3-month overnight survey 2010-11 – Conducted by DTU Transport

– Asks for trips (number and details) during the last 3 month of 5 kinds

• Number of trips to second homes for leisure

• Domestic and international trips

– Long duration with more than 5 nights

– Short duration with 1-5 nights international – Short duration with 2-5 nights domestic

– Conclusion: minor effect on number of trips, but the level is unclear

• Holiday and Business Travel Survey 1997-(2011) We use 2009-10 – Conducted by Statistics Denmark

– Asks for trips (number and details) for

• Holiday

• Business

• Visiting friends and relatives – from 2008

– Conclusion: Impossible to compare visits before and after 2008

4 Long Distance Travel 2010-11 26. August 2014

(5)

Number and distance of long distance journeys per year per Dane (15-85 year)

1 (2) - 5 nights 6 or more nights Second home All journeys

International 0.87 (16%) 0.79 (14%) 0.12 (2%) 1.79 (32%) Domestic 1.59 (29%) 0.28 (5%) 1.84 (33%) 3.86 (68%) All destinations 2.46 (45%) 1.07 (20%) 1.96 (36%) 5.49 (100%)

1 (2) - 5 nights 6 or more nights Second home All journeys International 1,886 (24%) 4,754 (62%) 141 (2%) 6,781 (88%) Domestic 556 (7%) 104 (1%) 283 (4%) 943 (12%) All destinations 2,442 (21%) 4,859 (63%) 424 (5%) 7,724 (100%)

(6)

DTU Transport, Technical University of Denmark

Share of respondents with a long duration journey in the last year

6 Long Distance Travel 2010-11 26. August 2014

(7)

Share of population with different types of

journeys during the last 3 month

(8)

DTU Transport, Technical University of Denmark

Share of respondents without any registered international journey

8 Long Distance Travel 2010-11 26. August 2014

Share of respondents

Has stated an international trip during the last year 51%

Had just returned back from an international journey

or had had a short duration international trip more than 3 month earlier 9%

A journey the year before 12%

A journey 2 years before 6%

A journey 3 years before 6%

A journey up to 5 years before 5%

A journey up to 10 years before 8%

Never left Denmark 2%

(9)

Travel purpose

Business and

education Holiday etc.

Visiting friends and

relatives

No

information In all

International short duration 33% 53% 9% 5% 100% (0.87)

International long duration 7% 84% 8% 1% 100% (0.79)

Domestic short duration 13% 35% 45% 7% 100% (1.59)

Domestic long duration 6% 63% 24% 7% 100% (0.29)

Second homes 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% (1.95)

All types 10% (0.56) 70% (4.00) 17% (0.93) 3% (0.18) 100% (5.49)

(10)

DTU Transport, Technical University of Denmark

Holiday travel distributed on supplementary purpose

10 Long Distance travel 2010-11 26. August 2014

International Domestic All trips short long short long

Visiting combined with holiday 3% 2% 5% 4% 3%

Cottage stay 1% 1% 4% 6% 2%

Relaxing and nothing else 18% 19% 50% 51% 31%

City holiday 55% 29% 20% 14% 31%

Nature holiday 10% 18% 12% 17% 14%

Seaside holiday 3% 32% 6% 10% 15%

Walking, biking, extreme sport 2% 2% 1% 2% 2%

Skiing, winter sports 6% 9% 0% 0% 5%

Festival, Match spectator 4% 0% 2% 4% 2%

Folk high school 0% 0% 0% 1% 0%

Private meeting 2% 1% 2% 1% 1%

Health or sanatorium stay 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Holiday, No further information 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

In all 104% 114% 104% 109% 108%

The respondents could mention combinations of city, nature, and seaside holidays.

(11)

Purpose and mode share

International Domestic All

Purpose Mode Short Long

Business, Education Car 24% 9% 66% 39%

Public 10% 7% 23% 14%

Air plane 67% 84% 11% 46%

Other (Bike, boat) 0% 0% 0% 0%

All 100% 100% 100% 100%

Holiday, Private Car 39% 28% 81% 51%

Public 20% 8% 15% 15%

Air plane 40% 63% 1% 33%

Other (Bike, boat) 1% 1% 3% 0%

All 100% 100% 100% 100%

Visiting friends and

relatives Car 43% 22% 56% 52%

Public 16% 7% 36% 33%

Air plane 41% 71% 2% 10%

Other (Bike, boat) 0% 0% 6% 5%

All 100% 100% 100% 100%

(12)

DTU Transport, Technical University of Denmark

12 Long Distance Travel 2010-11 26. August 2014

(13)

Travel distance and mode share

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

- 100 200

300 400

500 600

700 800 900 1.000 1.100 1.200 1.300 1.400 1.500 1.600

1.700 1.800 1.900 2.000 2.100 2.200 2.300

2.400 2.500

2.600 2.700

2.800

2.900 3.000

Car travel Air travel Other modes

(14)

DTU Transport, Technical University of Denmark

Trips year distributed over month

14 Long Distance Travel 2010-11 26. August 2014

(15)

Inequity in access to long distance travel

(16)

DTU Transport, Technical University of Denmark

16 Long Distance Travel 2010-11 26. August 2014

01 23 45 67

Under 50 Over 50 Under 50 Over 50 Living at home No children With children Over 50 year No children With children Over 50 year

Couple, no childrenFamily with children Under 30Single maleSingle female Trips per respondent per year

Domestic, sec. home Domestic, long

Domestic, short

Internat, sec. home Internat, long

Internat, short

(17)

CO

2

emission per year for different types of air travel

Passengers [Mio.]

Pass. Km [Mio. km]

CO

2

[Mio. ton]

CO

2

/pass km [g/km]

Domestic 427 0.13 315

From DK to destination

or first transfer 8.54 13,816 1.64 119

Charter 2.51 7,032 0.58 82

Transfer 2.69 10,853 1.17 107

Total 13.74 32,129 3.52 110

(18)

DTU Transport, Technical University of Denmark

CO

2

emission

18 Long Distance travel 2010-11 26. August 2014

(19)

Long term development in long distance

travel

(20)

DTU Transport, Technical University of Denmark

Long term development in mode share for European travel

20 Long Distance Travel 2010-11 26. August 2014

(21)
(22)

DTU Transport, Technical University of Denmark

Thank you for listening Any questions ?

22 Long Distance Travel 2010-11 26. August 2014

Referencer

RELATEREDE DOKUMENTER

Figure 1 shows the distribution of travel distances by transport mode for trips starting and finishing within the car2go Home Area, based on TU data (for walking, cycling,

Travel Agency functional requirements: Detailed use case diagram plan trip..

The costs can be consider exceptionally high only if the standard travel grant does not cover at least 70% of the actual travel costs (for more details, please consult the

Video recording of number plates at the street of Åboulevard in Copenhagen was carried out for long periods in 2008/09 and 2010/11, and these number plate data is coupled to

The trip frequency, destination and mode choice models were nested logit models divided into private and business long distance trips (>100 km) and seven trip purposes for

For this project we have selected 46 transport standard parameters (12 located in the submodel for short trips and 34 in the long distance model) mainly connected to transport time

The Model contains distinct modelling for long and short distance trips. Modelling of short distance trips is based on more extensive information and is therefore more precise than

TV = the value of saved travel time for business trips r = the share of saved travel time that is used for leisure p = the share of the time saved that was used productively q