• Ingen resultater fundet

Kong Haralds »mishandlede« Jellingsten

N/A
N/A
Info
Hent
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Del "Kong Haralds »mishandlede« Jellingsten"

Copied!
12
0
0

Indlæser.... (se fuldtekst nu)

Hele teksten

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)

SUMMARY

King Harald's "Mishandled" Jelling Stone

In this article the authors reply to Erik Moltke's criticism (Kuml 1979) of their views on the artistic disposition of the surface, the cutting technique used and damage to the Greater Jelling Stone (Kuml 1977).

After a re-examination of the stone, the cleavage along the left edge of side B - the lion side - is considered to have followed a cut line and occurred during work on the stone. The major damage at the corner between side A and B - both the desquamation and the more radical damage - is thought to be the effect of fire, presumably in connection with one of the church fires, as also suggested by Knud Krogh. Unlike Moltke, we have observed traces of a chisel used in rune-cutting (fig. I).

With respect to the composition, the lower line on sides C ånd D is regarded as an unused writing field. If Moltke's view that it served as a level during the erection of the stone were accepted, the Christ viewed frontally would be 10-12° out of true.

Finally the new observation has been made on Gorm's stone, the Lesser Jelling Stone, that the spiral on the right side must be seen as the eyes of a serpent's head which also has a characteristic beak-like snout.

A monumental mason who participated in the examination of the stone had the foliow­

ing comments to make.

He supposed that the work of cutting must have taken about one year. Before being cut, the ornament and runes were drawn directly on the stone as a basis for marking out and cutting. The runes and parts of the ornament seemed to him to have been made with a hammer and chisel, while other parts of the ornament and the background could have been made with a pick hammer or pick and hammer. Runes and lines on Gorm's stone he was sure had been made with pick or pick hammer, while a greater selection of tools had been used on Harald's stone.

Experiments making lines in granite with chisel and pick respectively revealed that only the chisel left marks as in fig. I.

14*

Erling Johansen og Aslak Liestøl Universitetets Oldsaksamling, Oslo Oversættelse: Peter Crabb

211

(12)

Referencer

RELATEREDE DOKUMENTER

To reduce selection bias, we compared the non-screening period with the screening period, and found that the introduction of general screening had a positive impact on

Both Denmark and Sweden have a lot of experience with gasification technologies, starting in the 1970’s in Sweden and in 1988 in Denmark. There has been a key focus on research

The included patients had previous- ly been hospitalized for depression in the Region of Zealand in Denmark and they did not differ from the patients who did not participate on

The Children’s Fund had been set up in 2000 as a catalyst for the reconfiguring of children’s services which was about to take place and it quite clearly made the participation

7 The Århus stone 4 (DR67), the Fjenneslev stone (DR 238), the Fuglie-stenen 2, the Norra Nöbbelöv stone (DR316), and the two inscriptions on the Lund stone 1 (DR 214) are all

*Before an interpretation of the Stone Age palaeolandscape and an assessment of the survey data has been made by the responsible maritime archaeological museum, the potential

To address the second question, we describe how practice-oriented courses with a high degree of on-site laboratory units had been restructured to pure online courses with virtual

As evidenced by sketched lines just to the inside of the cut line on the verso of CB 61 A (Fig. 6b), the modano was certainly flipped over after it had been cut, since the