Litteraturliste - 2. Kapitel 2: Juridisk analyse

Bøger:

Juridisk:

 Anderman, D. Steven: EC Competition Law and Intellectual Property Rights, The Regulation of Innovation. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1988

 Craig, Paul og De Búrca, Gráinne: EU Law, Text, Cases and Materials. 5. Udgave. Oxford University Press 2011

 Fejø, Jens: EU-Konkurrenceret, 4. Udgave. Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag 2009

 Fine, L. Frank: The EC Competition Law on Technology Licensing, Thomson, Sweet &

Maxwell, 2006

 Hansen Lundgaard, Kim; Kjølbye, Lars og Øe Saugmandsgaard, Henrik: EU konkurrenceretten, 1. udgave, GadJura, Thomson Information 1988

 Keeling, T. David: Intellectual Property Rights in EU Law, Volume I. Oxford University Press 2003

 Lindgreen, Nicolai; Schovsbo, Jens og Thorsen, Jesper: Patentloven med kommentarer. 1.

udgave. Jurist- og økonomforbundets Forlag 2012

 Nielsen, Ruth og Tvarnø, Christina: Retskilder & Retsteorier. 3. Reviderede udgave. Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag 2011

 Schovsbo, Jens og Rosenmeier, Morten: Immaterialret, ophavsret, patentret, brugsmodelret, designret, varemærkeret, 2. udgave, Jurist- og Økonomforbundets forlag 2011

Økonomisk:

 Carlton, W. Dennis og Perloff, M. Jeffrey: Modern Industrial Organization, 4. Udgave, Pearson Addison Wesley 2005

 Eide, Erling og Stavang Endre: Rettsøkonomi, Cappelen Damm AS 2008

 Field C., Barry: Evironmental economics: an introduction, New York McGraw-Hill 1997, 2^nd edition

 Glader, Marcus: Innovation Markets and Competition Analysis, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 2006

Side 81 af 85

 J. Van den Berg, Roger og Camesasca D., Peter: European Competition Lanw and Economics:

A comparative Perspective, 2^nd Edition, Thomson Sweet & Maxwell 2006

 Knudsen, Kristian: The essential tension on the social sciences: Between the “unification” and

“fragmentation” trap, JEL Classifications: A12 and B40

 Metcalfe, J. Stanley: Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction, Routledge London and New York 1998

 Pindyck, S. Robert og Rubinfeld, L. Daniel: Microeconomics, 6. udgave, Pearson Prentice Hall 2005

 Polanyi, Michael: The Tacit Dimension, The University of Chicago Press 1983

 Schumpeter A. Joseph: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Routledge; New Ed Edition 1942 Domme:

 AKZO Chemie BV mod Kommissionen: Sag 62/86

 Bernhard Pfeiffer mm. mod Deutches Rotes Kreuz Kreisverband Waldshut eV: De forenede sager C-397/01 – C-403/01

 BP mod Kommissionen: 77/77

 Bronner dommen: Sag C-7/97

 COMP/C-3/37.792 – Microsoft

 Costa mod ENEL: Sag 6/64

 Forslag til afgørelse fra General Advokat Jacobs fremsat den 28. maj 1988

 Hoffman La Roche dommen: Sag 85/76

 IMS Health dommen: C-418/01

 Kommissionens meddelelse om afgrænsning af det relevante marked i forbindelse med Fællesskabets konkurrenceret: C 372/5

 Kommissionens Beslutning i Magill: 89/205/EØF

 Magill dommen: De forenede sager C-241/91 P og C-242/91 P

 Metro SB-Grossmärkte GmbH & Co. KG mod Kommissionen: Sag 75/84

 Microsoft dommen: T-201/04

 NDC Healths klage om IMS til Kommissionen2002/165/EF

 Oscar Bronner GmbH & Co. KG mod Mediaprint Zeitungs- und Zeitschriftenverlag GmbH &

Co. KG, Mediaprint Zeitungsvertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG og Mediaprint Anzeigengesellschaft mbH & Co. KG: Sag 7/97

 Parke Davis and Co. mod Probel, Reese, Beintema-Interpharm og Centrafarm: Sag 24/67

 Renault dommen: Sag 53/87

Side 82 af 85

 United Brands Company mod Kommissionen: Sag C 27/76

 Volvo: Sag 238/87 Artikler:

Juridiske:

 Anderman, Steven: Does the Microsoft Case offer a New Paradigm for the ”Exceptional Circumstances” Test and Compulsory Copyright Licences under EC Competition Law?, The Competition Law Review, Volume 1 Issue 2, 2004

 Ahlborn, Christian; Evans, S. David and Padilla, A. Jorge: The Logic & Limits of the

“Exceptional Circumstances Test” in Magill and IMS Health. Volume 28, Issue 4, Article 9, Fordham International Law Journal by Berkeley Electronic Press, 2004

 Craig, Paul og De Búrca, Gráinne: EU Law, Text, Cases and Materials. 5. Udgave. Oxford University Press 2011

 Forrester S., Ian: Regulating Intellectual Property Via Competition? Or Regulating Competition Via Intellectual Property? Competition and Intellectual Property: ten years on, the debate still flourishes, European University Institute, Robert Shuman Centre for Advanced Studies, 2005

 Guido, Calabresi og Melamed, Douglas A.: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability:

One View of the Cathedral, Harward Law Review, 1972, Volume 85, Number 6

 Killick, James: IMS and Microsoft Judged in the Cold light of IMS, The competition Law Review, Volume 1 Issue 2, 2004

 Lianos, Ioannis: Competition Law and Intellectual Property Rights: Is the Property Rights’

Approach Right?. John Bell & Claire Kilpatrick, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006, Kapitel 8

 Schäfer, Hans-Bernd og Ott, Claus: The Dichotomy Between Property Rules and Liability Rules:

Experiences from German Law, Erasmus Law Review, Volume 01, Issue 04, 2008

 Turney, James: Defining the Limits of the EU Essential Facilities Doctrine on Intellectual Property Rights: The Primacy of Securing Optimal Innovation, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Volume 3, no 2, 2005

 Tusek, Irena: EU Competition Law Policy Versus Intellectual Property Rights: A Study of the Microsoft Case, Croation Yearbook of European Law and Policy, Volume 6, No. 6, 2010

Side 83 af 85

 Vesterdorf, Bo: Article 82 EC: Where do we stand after the Microsoft judgement?, ICC Annual Competition Law and Policy Lecture 2008

Økonomiske:

 Baroni, Justus og Delcamp, Henry: The Private and Social Value of Patents in Discrete and Cumulative Innovation, Cerna Working Paper 2011, s. 7

 Bauer M., Johannes: Market Power, Innovation, and Efficiency in Telecommunications:

Schumpeter Reconsidered, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXXI, no. 2, June 1997

 Chien, Colleen: Cheap drugs at what price to innovation: does the compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals hurt innovation? Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2003

 Calandrillo P, Steve: 301 An Economic Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights: Justifications and Problems of Exclusive Rights, Incentives to Generate Information, and the Alternative of a Government-run Reward System, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 1998

 Etro, Federico: Competition, Innovation and Antitrust, 1. Udgave, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

 Gallini, Nancy og Scotchmer, Suzanne: Intellectual Property: When is the Best Incentive System?, MIT Press 2002, Volume 2

 Glader, Marcus: Innovation Markets and Competition Analysis, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 2006

 Gerster, Richard: Patents and Development Lessons Learnt from the Economic History of Switzerland, 2001

 Heger, Diana and Kornelius, Kraft: Barriers to Entry and Profitability, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 08-071/Center for European Economic Research 2008

 J. Van den Bergh, Roger og Camesasca D., Peter: European Competition Law and Economics:

A Comparative Perspective, 2^nd Edition, Thomson Sweet & Mawxwell 2006

 Jaffe B., Adam; Lerner, Josh og Stern, Scott: Innovation Policy and Economy, MIT Press 2002, Volume 2

 Kirzner M., Israel: Perception, opportunity and profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship, The University of Chicago Press 1979

 Larouche, Pierre: The European Microsoft Case at the Crossroads of Competition Policy and Innovation, Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC) 2008

Side 84 af 85

 Lieberman, Marvin og Montgomery, David: First-Mover (Dis)Advantages: Retrospective and Link with Resource-Based View, Strategic Management Journal, Volume 19, nr. 12, December 1998

 Lieberman, Marvin og Montgomery, David: First-Mover Advantages, JSTOR 1988, Strategic Management Journal, Volume 9

 Machlup, Fritz: An economic review of the patent system, Eighty Fifth Congress, Second Session, Study no 15, 1958

 Marx, Karl og Engels, Frederick: Manifesto of the Communist Party, 1848

 Mazzoleni, Roberto og Nelson R., Richard: Economic theories about the benefits and costs of patents, Journal of Economic Issues, December 1998; pp. 1031-1052

 Mazzoleni, Roberto og Nelson R., Richard: The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate, ELSEVIER 1997, Research Policy 27

 Møllgaard, Peter: Konkurrence og konkurrencepolitik

 Nicita, Antonio og Vatiero, Massimiliano; Incomplete Contracts, Irreversible Investments and Entry Deterrence, University of Siena, Department of Economics, JEL CODE:D23, D85, L14

 Paganetto, Luigi: Knowledge economy, Information Technologies and Growth, Ashgate Publishing Limited 2004

 Page H., William og Lopatka E., John : Network Externalities, 1999

 Riis, Thomas: Retsøkonomi, De nordiske Juristmøder 2000, Del 2 - 1145-1163

 Rousseva, Ekaterina: The concept of “Objective Justification” of an Abuse of a Dominant Position: Can It Help to Modernise the Analysis under Article 82 EC?, Competition Law Review 2006, Volume 2, Issues 2

 Samuelson A., Paul: The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Volume 36, No. 4, 1954

 Sastry, Bhaskar: Market Structure and Incentives for Innovation, June 2005

 Schmalensee, Richard: Sunk Costs and Antitrust Barriers to Entry, MIT Sloan School of Management 2004, Working Paper 4457-04

 Schumpeter A. Joseph: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Routledge; New Ed Edition 1942

 Scotchmer, Suzanne and Green, Jerry: Novelty and Disclosure in Patent Law, Volume 21, number 1, The RAND Journal of Economics 1990

 Schwalbe, Ulrich og Zimmer, Daniel: Law and Economics in European Merger Control, Oxford University Press 2009

In document 2. Kapitel 2: Juridisk analyse (Sider 81-86)