• Ingen resultater fundet

Implications and Recommendations

The tension between private and public actors that has arisen due to states entering global

governance of responsible investment, implies that private actors might choose to disregard public policy in favour of their own ‘expert knowledge’. This can have serious implications for the compliance of any regulatory frameworks that might build as a response to the ‘inevitable policy response’. This implication needs to be studied further. As does the idea set in this thesis, that the traditional short-term economic thinking as well as the narrow approach to fiduciary duty, are both incapable of upholding the principle of ‘do no harm’. Moreover, the tension of states being

regulators, and the private industry being the one with the expert knowledge, can create an

interesting case on private involvement in public regulation, and whether or not states would rather build their own knowledge-bank or involve the ‘compliantees’ of regulation.

For policy makers, the recommendations of this thesis is to build a rapport and trust with the actors, whose position in the global governance have long since been established. On top of this, there must be a legal framework to emphasise the due diligence responsibilities of investors to ensure their assets do no harm.

8 Bibliography

AVSI. (n.d.). Business and Human Rights: a challenge for enterprises?

Bellamy, A. J., & Dunne, T. (Eds.). (2019). The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect.

Retrieved from

https://www-oxfordhandbooks-com.esc- web.lib.cbs.dk:8443/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198753841.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198753841-e-5

Belsom, T., & Wearmouth, C. (2020, June). The evolution of screening: from ‘sin’ to

sophistication | Blogs | PRI. PRI Blog. Retrieved from https://www.unpri.org/pri-blogs/the-evolution-of-screening-from-sin-to-sophistication/5899.article

BlackRock. (2015). The Price of Climate Change.

Buhmann, K. (2017a). Changing sustainability norms through communication processes: the emergence of the business and human rights regime as transnational law. (E. E. Publishing, Ed.). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Buhmann, K. (2017b). Power, Procedure, Participation and Legitimacy in Global Sustainability Norms (1st ed.). Abingdon, Oxon [UK] ; New York : Routledge, 2017. | Series:

Globalization : law and policy: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315525457

Buhmann, K., Jonsson, J., & Fisker, M. (2018). Do no harm and do more good too: connecting the SDGs with business and human rights and political CSR theory. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2018-0030 Carbon Tracker. (2011). Unburnable Carbon - Are the world’s financial markets carrying a carbon

bubble?

Carney, M. (2015). Breaking the tragedy of the horizon - climate change and financial stability - speech by Mark Carney | Bank of England. Retrieved May 23, 2016, from

http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/2015/844.aspx

Carrington, D. (2015). World’s biggest sovereign wealth fund dumps dozens of coal companies | Environment | The Guardian. Retrieved May 23, 2016, from

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/05/worlds-biggest-sovereign-wealth-fund- dumps-dozens-of-coal-companies

Cerny, P. G. (2010). Globalizing the Public Policy Process. In Rethinking World Politics: A Theory of Transnational Neopluralism (pp. 111–127). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof Drezner, D. W. (2014). The system worked: Global economic governance during the great

recession. World Politics, 66(1), 123–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887113000348 Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2016). Qualitative Methids in Business Research (2nd ed.).

SAGE.

EU Commission. (n.d.). TOOL #18. THE CHOICE OF POLICY INSTRUMENTS.

Eurosif. (2020). Mission.

García-Meca, E., López-Iturriaga, F., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. (2017). Institutional Investors on Boards: Does Their Behavior Influence Corporate Finance? Journal of Business Ethics, 146(2), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2882-z

Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2014). Dynamic governance interactions: Evolutionary effects of state responses to non-state certification programs. Regulation & Governance, 8, 74–92.

Gusmão Caiado, R. G., Leal Filho, W., Quelhas, O. L. G., Luiz de Mattos Nascimento, D., &

Ávila, L. V. (2018). A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the

implementation of the sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1276–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.102

Hill, J. (2018). The rise of thematic investing. Citywire. Retrieved from

https://citywire.co.uk/wealth-manager/news/the-rise-of-thematic-investing/a1082060 Lydenberg, S. (2014). Reason, Rationality, and Fiduciary Duty. Journal of Business Ethics,

119(3), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1632-3

MarketBeat. (2018). What are Institutional Investors? Retrieved December 17, 2019, from https://www.marketbeat.com/financial-terms/what-are-institutional-investors/

Martin, W. (2009). Socially responsible investing: Is your fiduciary duty at risk? Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0060-x

Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). CORPORATE CITIZENSHIP: TOWARD AN EXTENDED THEORETICAL CONCEPTUALIZATION, 30(1), 166–179.

Moses, J. W., & Knutsen, T. L. (2012). Ways of knowing: Competing methodologies in social and

Norges Bank. (n.d.). About the fund. Retrieved December 17, 2019, from https://www.nbim.no/en/the-fund/about-the-fund/

Orsato, R. J. (2009). Sustainability Strategies. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230236851

Ponte, S. (2014). “Roundtabling” sustainability: Lessons from the biofuel industry. Geoforum, 54, 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.07.008

Pozen, R. (1994). Institutional investors: The reluctant activists. Harvard Business Review, 72(1), 140–149.

PRI. (n.d.). What are the Principles for Responsible Investment? | Other | PRI. Retrieved

September 14, 2020, from https://www.unpri.org/pri/what-are-the-principles-for-responsible-investment

PRI. (2020). Investing with SDG outcomes: a five-part framework | Reports/Guides | PRI.

Retrieved from https://www.unpri.org/sustainable-development-goals/investing-with-sdg-outcomes-a-five-part-framework/5895.article

Puaschunder, J. M. (2016). Socially Responsible Investment As Emergent Risk Prevention and Means to Imbue Trust In The Post-2008/2009 World Financial Crisis Economy. In Routledge Handbook of Social and Sustainable Finance (pp. 222–238). London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315772578.ch14

Rosenau, J. N. (2007). Governing the ungovernable: The challenge of a global disaggregation of authority. Regulation & Governance, 1(1), 88–97.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00001.x

Sheng, E. (2020). ESG investing: why does the US still lag behind? RACONTEUR. Retrieved from https://www.raconteur.net/finance/responsible-investment-2020/usa-esg-investing Sievänen, R., Sumelius, J., Islam, K. M. Z., & Sell, M. (2013). From struggle in responsible

investment to potential to improve global environmental governance through UN PRI.

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(2), 197–217.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-012-9188-8

Simon, H. (1997). Administrative Behavior (4th ed., pp. 92–139). New York: Free Press.

Stevens, P. (2019). Complete guide to ESG and socially responsible investing (SRI). CNBC.

Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/14/your-complete-guide-to-socially-responsible-investing.html

Steward Redqueen. (2016). From Principles To Performance: An Independent Evaluation of the PRI’s Achievements and Challenges at Ten Years.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

Taft, J. (2012). Stewardship. United States: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Finance. (2019). Financing Sustainable Growth. Retrieved from

https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/accounting_and_taxes/docu ments/190618-sustainable-finance-factsheet_en.pdf

The DNRF’s responsible investment policy - Danish National Research Foundation. (n.d.).

Retrieved September 15, 2020, from https://dg.dk/en/the-dnrfs-responsible-investment-policy/

The European Commission. (n.d.). What is sustainable finance. Retrieved September 4, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/sustainable-finance/what-sustainable-finance_en#what

The Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. (2018). Global Sustainable Investment Review.

The Principles for Responsible Investment. (2019). ACTIVE OWNERSHIP 2.0: THE EVOLUTION STEWARDSHIP URGENTLY NEEDS.

Thwing Eastman, M., Horrocks, P., Singh, T., & Kumar, N. (2018). Institutional Investing for the SDGS, (December). Retrieved from https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/1a9bb8dc-2fd5-de60-bc83-28cc93102fbe

Türke, R.-E. (2012). Sustainable Governance. In S. N. Grösser & R. Zeier (Eds.), Systemic Management for Intelligent Organizations (pp. 237-). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29244-6

UKSIF. (2020). What is Sustainable Finance?

UN. (2008). Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights.

from https://www.unpri.org/an-introduction-to-responsible-investment/what-is-responsible-investment/4780.article

UN PRI. (2013). The Six Principles, 8–10. Retrieved from http://www.unpri.org/about-pri/the-six-principles/

UN PRI. (2019). How can a passive investor be a responsible investor? United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment. Retrieved from https://www.unpri.org/download?ac=6729 UN PRI. (2020a). Screening Responsible Investment. The Principles for Responsible Investment.

UN PRI. (2020b). What is responsible investment? Retrieved September 4, 2020, from https://www.unpri.org/an-introduction-to-responsible-investment/what-is-responsible-investment/4780.article

UNEP FI. (2005). A Legal Framework for the Integration of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues Into Institutional Investment.

UNFCCC. (n.d.). Historic Paris Agreement on Climate Change.

University of Cambridge. (2015). Thematic investment. Retrieved September 6, 2020, from

https://web.archive.org/web/20160912231055/https:/www.cisl.cam.ac.uk/business- action/sustainable-finance/investment-leaders-group/what-is-responsible-investment/forms-of-responsible-investment/thematic-investment

Waitzer, E. J., & Sarro, D. (n.d.). Re-Defining the Social Utility of Financial Services. Retrieved from http://www.capitalmarketexperts.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Edward-Waitzer-Re-Defining-the-Social-Utility-of-Financial-Services.pdf

WCED, W. C. on E. and D. (1987). Our Common Future. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(91)90424-R

Weber, O. (2016). Impact Investing. In Routledge Handbook of Social and Sustainable Finance (pp. 85–101). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315772578.ch6

WOLF, K. D. (2014). The non-existence of private self-regulation in the transnational sphere and its implications for the responsibility to procure legitimacy: The case of the lex sportiva . Global Constitutionalism (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045381714000057

Wood, D. (2015). What do we mean by the S in ESG? Society as a stakeholder in responsible investment. In The Routledge Handbook of Responsible Investment (pp. 553–564). London: