• Ingen resultater fundet

Future  work

In document Homing Interactions (Sider 159-193)

8.   Conclusions

8.3.   Future  work

There   are   also   multiple   other   contributions   to   the   company   that   goes   beyond   this   dissertation   work.   These   concern   insights   in   regards   of   trends   in   high-­‐end   homes,   new   collaboration  partners  introduced  through  expert  interviews  and  so  fourth.    

 

The   design   experiments   have   also   led   to   some   contributions,   though   not   being   directly   transformed   into   future   products   in   the   company.   The   connected   experience   demonstrates  that  connecting  through  music  has  great  potentials,  since  it  can  provide  a   strong   feeling   of   connection   if   integrated   into   the   sound   system   and   if   the   system   can   attract  attention  when  remotely  used  to  support  serendipity.  A  specific  outcome  from  the   research  is  realized  through  a  patent  concerning  the  scale  of  connecting  remotely.  

 

The   study   furthermore   points   towards   the   implications   of   a   design   space   for   slow   technology  in  the  home,  where  the  experience  is  perceived  as  poetic  and  sensuous.    

 

I  also  wish  to  point  towards  the  importance  of  bringing  magical  experiences  to  the  homes.  

The  company  has  an  incredible  expertise  in  mechanical  movement  in  products  that  have   led   to   an   experience   of   magic   when   experiencing   this.   The   big   challenge   now   is   to   translate  this  into  the  digital  era.    

 

The   contributions   towards   industry   beyond   Bang   &   Olufsen   also   concern   the   above-­‐

mentioned  contributions  in  regards  of  luxury  companies  and  home  audio  systems.  But  the   main   contribution   is   found   in   the   taxonomy   of   homing   interactions.   The   dissertation   provides  a  better  understanding  of  mobility  through  the  mapping  of  homing  tactics  that   are  then  applicable  in  the  design  process  when  the  respective  companies  want  to  address   mobility   in   relation   to   their   designs.   The   application   of   Homing   Interactions   will   be   interesting  to  see  applied  towards  different  kinds  of  products  and  services.  

 

8.3. Future work

There  are  two  areas  that  I  would  like  to  pursue  with  further  research:  One  is  the  area  of   the  tactics,  in  particular  further  development  of  the  Artifacting  tactic  was  only  identified   in   the   very   late   part   of   the   process,   as   well   as   further   explorations   of   the   Homing  

Interactions   beyond   Connecting.   The   other   area   concerns   a   potential   in   developing   the   term  eccentric  interaction,  which  is  inspired  by  designing  for  the  wealthy.    

 

This  dissertation  treats  the  Connecting  Interaction  through  design  experiments.  It  would   be   interesting   to   try   designing   for   the   other   Homing   Interactions,   to   learn   more   about   them   as   well   as   experience   the   outcome   for   the   different   interactions.   Further   research   can   uncover   if   all   homing   interactions   are   suitable   for   being   supported   through   interaction   design   or   if   there   are   areas   in   this   field   that   are   best   supported   by   other   means.  

 

The  Artifacting  tactic  did  not  become  clear  until  the  late  in  this  dissertation  work,  as  we   have  been  working  around  the  Outboxing  tactic  instead.  I  would  like  to  further  discover   how   people   perform   the   Artifacting   tactic   and   develop   concepts   that   meet   this   tactic   through   interactive   artifacts   that   support   a   home   feeling.   The   literature   about   nomadic   possessions   and   theorizing   artifacts   ethnographically   (Henare,   Wastell,   &   Holbraad,   2006)  represents  a  new  turn  in  ethnographical  research  that  would  be  very  interesting  to   bring  together  with  possession  theories  (R.  W.  Belk,  1988)  as  well  as  developing  design   and  prototypes  towards  Artifacting  Interactions.    

 

The  second  theme  that  I  would  like  to  pursue  if  the  research  were  to  continue  lies  in  the   area   of   Eccentric   Interaction,   which   is   an   interaction   ideal   emphasizing   the   staging   of   homes  and  people  through  the  way  they  interact  with  technology.  The  background  for  the   interaction  paradigm  is  rolled  out  in  the  paper:    

 

Published as: Lynggaard, A. B., Petersen, M. G. & Hepworth, S. de J., I had a Dream and I Built it” -Power and Self-Staging in Ubiquitous High-End Homes, CHI 2012, ACM digital Library

 

It  highlights  how  people  look  and  feel  when  they  interact  with  technology  in  the  eyes  of   themselves  and  the  people  surrounding  them.  Eccentric  Interaction  views  interaction  in  a   social   and   physical   context   where   the   people   around   the   user   become   spectators   that   should   be   impressed.   It   is   a   matter   of   living   out   your   dreams   and   passions.   Eccentric   interaction  involves  designing  technologies  that  enable  people  to  exercise  their  passions,   and  to  express  themselves  through  the  expression  while  interacting  with  technology.  The  

products   at   Bang   &   Olufsen   appeal   to   us   through   the   heuristics   of   what   is   defined   as   BeoMagic  (Hepworth,  2007;  Lynggaard  &  Mortensen,  2012)  and  this  ideal  has  potentials   for  further  exploration  that  can  be  applied  more  generally  than  towards  the  marginal  of   the  wealthy.  

References

Agnew, J. (1987). The united states in the world-economy : A regional geography. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Aipperspach, R., Hooker, B., & Woodruff, A. (2008). The heterogeneous home. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Seoul, Korea. 222-231. doi:

http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1409635.1409666

Archer, B. (1995). The nature of research. Co-Design, Interdisciplinary Journal of Design,

Augé, M. (2000). Non-places : Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity [Non-lieux] (Repr.

ed.). London: Verso.

Bachelard, G., & Jolas, M. (1994). The poetics of space. Boston: Beacon Press.

Ballagas, R., Kaye, J. '., Ames, M., Go, J., & Raffle, H. (2009). Family communication: Phone

conversations with children. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Como, Italy. 321-324. doi: 10.1145/1551788.1551874

Bang & Olufsen official website. Retrieved 11/08, 2011, from http://www.bang-Olufsen.dk/

Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragments : Essays in postmodern morality. Oxford: Blackwell.

Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. The Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715.

Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139.

Bell, G., Blythe, M., & Sengers, P. (2005). Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies. ACM Trans.Comput.-Hum.Interact., 12(2), 149-173. doi:

10.1145/1067860.1067862

Benjamin, W. (1995). From berlin childhood in nineteen hundred. Grand Street - LA English, 13(4), 112.

Benjamin, W. (2006). Berlin childhood around 1900. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Blythe, M., & Monk, A. (2002). Notes towards an ethnography of domestic technology. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and

Techniques, London, England. 277-281. doi: 10.1145/778712.778750

Brave, S., & Dahley, A. (1997). inTouch: A medium for haptic interpersonal communication. CHI '97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Looking to the Future, Atlanta, Georgia. 363-364. doi: 10.1145/1120212.1120435

Brayer, M., Migayrou, F., & Nanjo, F. (2005). Archilab's urban experiments : Radical architecture, art and the city. London: Mori Art Museum : Thames & Hudson.

Brown, B., Taylor, A. S., Izadi, S., Sellen, A., Kaye, J. '., & Eardley, R. (2007). Locating family values:

A field trial of the whereabouts clock. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Innsbruck, Austria. 354-371.

Brush, A. J. B., & Inkpen, K. M. (2007). Yours, mine and ours? sharing and use of technology in domestic environments. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Innsbruck, Austria. 109-126.

Brush, A. J. B., Lee, B., Mahajan, R., Agarwal, S., Saroiu, S., & Dixon, C. (2011). Home automation in the wild: Challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2115-2124. doi:

http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979249

Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23. doi:

doi:10.1162/07479360152681056

Buchenau, M., & Suri, J. F. (2000). Experience prototyping. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, New York City, New York, United States. 424-433. doi: 10.1145/347642.347802

Burns, P., & Novelli, M. (2008). Tourism and mobilities : Local-global connections. Wallingford, UK:

CABI.

Buur, J., & Sitorus, L. (2007). Ethnography as design provocation. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2007(1), 146-157. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-8918.2007.tb00071.x Buxton, W. (2007). Sketching user experience : Getting the design right and the right design. San

Francisco, Calif.; Oxford: Morgan Kaufmann ; Elsevier Science [distributor].

Certeau, M. d. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Chatwin, B. (1988). The songlines. London: Penguin.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review - LA English, 44(3), 35.

Chesbrough, H. W., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2008). Open innovation : Researching a new paradigm (4. printing ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ciolfi, L., & Bannon, L. J. (2002). Learning from mueseum visits: Shaping design sensitivities. In J.

Jacko, & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Human-computer interaction: Theory and practice, part I, volume I (pp. 63-67) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Incorporated.

Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., & Rodden, T. (2002). Pattern-based support for interactive design in domestic settings. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, London, England. 265-276. doi: 10.1145/778712.778749 Crabtree, A., & Rodden, T. (2004). Domestic routines and design for the home. Comput.Supported

Coop.Work, 13(2), 191-220. doi: 10.1023/B:COSU.0000045712.26840.a4

Cresswell, T. (2006). Place : A short introduction (Repr. ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Design and order in everyday life. In V. Margolin, & R. Buchanan (Eds.), The idea of design (2nd ed., pp. 118-126). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Davidoff, S., Ziebart, B. D., Zimmerman, J., & Dey, A. K. (2011). Learning patterns of pick-ups and drop-offs to support busy family coordination. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 1175-1184. doi:

10.1145/1978942.1979119

De Bono, E. (1971). Lateral thinking for management : A handbook. London: McGraw-Hill.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus : Capitalism and schizophrenia. London:

Athlone Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1986). Nomadology : The war machine. New York, NY, USA:

Semiotext(e).

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). A thousand plateaus [Mille plateaux] (5 printing ed.). Minneapolis:

Univ. of Minnesota P.

Dey, A. K., & de Guzman, E. (2006). From awareness to connectedness: The design and deployment of presence displays. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montr\&\#233;al, Qu\&\#233;bec, Canada. 899-908. doi: 10.1145/1124772.1124905 Djajadiningrat, J. P., Gaver, W. W., & Fres, J. W. (2000). Interaction relabelling and extreme characters:

Methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, New York City, New York, United States. 66-71. doi: 10.1145/347642.347664

Do, E. Y., & Gross, M. D. (1996). In Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘96 Workshop on Visual

Representation, Reasoning and Interaction in Design (Ed.), Drawing as means for design reasoning.

Palo Alto, CA: University of Washington.

Douglas, M. (1991). The idea of home: A kind of space. Social Research, 58(1), 287.

Dourish, P. (2006). Implications for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montr\&\#233;al, Qu\&\#233;bec, Canada. 541-550. doi:

10.1145/1124772.1124855

Dourish, P., & Bell, G. (2011). Divining a digital future mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing.

Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Edwards, S., & Petten, V. V. (2011). Living radically. Retrieved 3/21, 2012, from http://www.livingradically.com/2010/04/what-is-an-urban-nomad/

Edwards, W. K., & Grinter, R. E. (2001). At home with ubiquitous computing: Seven challenges.

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

256-272.

Ehn, P. (2008). Participation in design things. Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, Bloomington, Indiana. 92-101.

Elektronik i hjemmet 2011. Retrieved 02/14/2012 from http://www.dst.dk/pukora/epub/Nyt/2011/NR206.pdf

Eurostat. Retrieved 03/09, 2012, from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/

Fogtmann, M. H., & Kinch, S. (2011). The design researcher in quandary: The conflicting roles of being both a designer and a design researcher. Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design, Eindhoven, Netherlands. 193-196. doi: 10.1145/2079216.2079244

Franklin, A., & Crang, M. (2001). The trouble with tourism and travel theory? Turist Studies, 1(1), 5-22.

Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design Royal College of Art.

Gaver, W. W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., & Walker, B. (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions, 11(5), 53-56. doi: 10.1145/1015530.1015555

Gaver, W. W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., . . . Walker, B.

(2004). The drift table: Designing for ludic engagement. CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria. 885-900. doi: 10.1145/985921.985947

Geerts, D., Cesar, P., & Bulterman, D. (2008). The implications of program genres for the design of social television systems. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video, Silicon Valley, California, USA. 71-80. doi:

10.1145/1453805.1453822

Geerts, D., & De Grooff, D. (2009). Supporting the social uses of television: Sociability heuristics for social tv. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, USA. 595-604. doi: 10.1145/1518701.1518793

Gemmell, J., Bell, G., & Lueder, R. (2006). MyLifeBits: A personal database for everything.

Commun.ACM, 49(1), 88-95. doi: 10.1145/1107458.1107460

Giddens, A. (1997). The consequences of modernity (Repr. ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Giddens, A., & Pierson, C. (1998). Conversations with anthony giddens : Making sense of modernity.

Cambridge: Polity Press.

Grivas, K. (2006). Digital selves: Devices for intimate communications between homes. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 10(2-3), 66-76. doi: 10.1007/s00779-005-0003-1

Gundelach, P. (Ed.). (2002). Danskernes værdier 1981-1999. Kbh.: Hans Reitzel.

Hallnäs, L., & Redström, J. (2001). Slow technology – designing for reflection. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 5(3), 201-212. doi: 10.1007/PL00000019

Halse, J. (2008). Design anthropology: Borderland experiments with participation, performance and situated intervention

Harper, R. (2003). Inside the smart home Springer - LA English.

Heidegger, M. (2000). Sproget og ordet. Kbh.: Hans Reitzel.

Henare, A., Wastell, S., & Holbraad, M. (2006). Thinking through things Taylor & Francis Group;

Routledge Ltd - LA English.

Hepworth, S. d. J. (2007). Magical experiences in interaction design. Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, Helsinki, Finland. 108-118. doi:

10.1145/1314161.1314171

Hindus, D., Mainwaring, S. D., Leduc, N., Hagström, A. E., & Bayley, O. (2001). Casablanca:

Designing social communication devices for the home. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, Washington, United States. 325-332. doi:

10.1145/365024.383749

Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (2000). Globalization in question : The international economy and the possibilities of governance (2. ed., repr. ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

A home is something you do (translated from danish). Retrieved 3/11, 2012, from http://boligforskning.dk/et-hjem

Hooks, B. (1990). Yearning : Race, gender, and cultural politics. Boston, MA: South End Press.

Jacobsen, M. H., & Marshman, S. (2008). Bauman's metaphors. Current Sociology, 56(5), 798-818. doi:

10.1177/0011392108093836

Jacobson, S., & Pirinen, A. (2007). Disabled persons as lead users in the domestic environment.

Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, Helsinki, Finland. 158-167. doi: 10.1145/1314161.1314175

Janeway, E. (1977). Man's world, woman's place : A study in social mythology : By elizabeth janeway.

Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Jeppe hein. (2008). Retrieved 06/10, 2012, from http://sculpture-center.org/pressSpecific.htm?id=61942 Judge, T. K., Neustaedter, C., & Kurtz, A. F. (2010). The family window: The design and evaluation of a

domestic media space. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 2361-2370. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753682

Kaye, J. '. (2006). I just clicked to say I love you: Rich evaluations of minimal communication. CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 363-368.

doi: 10.1145/1125451.1125530

King, A. D. (1991). Culture, globalization, and the world-system : Contemporary conditions for the representation of identity. Basingstroke: Macmillan.

King, S., & Forlizzi, J. (2007). Slow messaging: Intimate communication for couples living at a distance.

Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, Helsinki, Finland. 451-454. doi: 10.1145/1314161.1314204

Kleine, S. S., & Baker, S. M. (2004). An integrative review of material possession attachment. Academy of Marketing Science Review - LA English, 2004, 1.

Koskinen, I., Binder, T., & Redstrom, J. (2008). LAB, FIELD, GALLERY, AND BEYOND. Artifact, 2(1), 46.

Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. (2011). Design research through practice : From the lab, field, and showroom (1st ed.). Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews : An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks:

Sage.

Ledoux, L. (2005). Measuring progress towards a mre sustainable europe -sustainable development indicators for the european union DATA 1990-2005. Retrieved 02/15, 2012, from

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/coded_files/sustainable_europe_2005.pdf

LIVING: Mark vacher. Retrieved 02/29, 2012, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkPuoYiKq4c Ljungblad, S., & Holmquist, L. E. (2007). Transfer scenarios: Grounding innovation with marginal

practices. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA. 737-746. doi: 10.1145/1240624.1240738

Loke, L., & Robertson, T. (2012). Studies of dancers:<br />Moving from experience to interaction design. International Journal of Design, 4(2)

Lottridge, D., Masson, N., & Mackay, W. (2009). Sharing empty moments: Design for remote couples.

Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, USA. 2329-2338. doi: 10.1145/1518701.1519058

Low, S. M. (2004). The memorialization of september 11: Dominant and local discourses on the rebuilding of the world trade center site. American Ethnologist, 31(3), 326-339. doi:

10.1525/ae.2004.31.3.326

Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design : A design perspective on information technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

Ludvigsen, M. (2006). Designing for social interaction. Department of Design, Aarhus School of Architecture).

Lynggaard, A. B., & Mortensen, D. H. (2012). BeoMagic: Analysis of BeoSound 9000. Computer Human Interaction 2012, Austin, Texas,

Mallett, S. (2004). Understanding home: A critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 62-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00442.x

Malpas, J. (1999). Place and experience : A philosophical topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Massimi, M., Dimond, J. P., & Le Dantec, C. A. (2012). Finding a new normal: The role of technology in life disruptions. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, Washington, USA. 719-728. doi: 10.1145/2145204.2145314

May, J. (2000). Of nomads and vagrants: Single homelessness and narratives of home as a place.

Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 737-759.

McGee, K., & Skågeby, J. (2004). Gifting technologies. First Monday, 9(12)

Merleau-Ponty, M.,1908-1961, & Baldwin, T.,1947-. (2004). Maurice merleau-ponty : Basic writings [Selections]. London: Routledge.

Miller, A. D., & Edwards, W. K. (2007). Give and take: A study of consumer photo-sharing culture and practice. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA. 347-356. doi: 10.1145/1240624.1240682

Muller, M. J., & Kuhn, S. (1993). Participatory design. Commun.ACM, 36(6), 24-28. doi:

10.1145/153571.255960

Naficy, H. (1999). Home, exile, homeland : Film, media, and the politics of place. New York: Routledge.

Nardi, B. A. (1992). The use of scenarios in design. SIGCHI Bull., 24(4), 13-14. doi:

10.1145/142167.142171

Nardi, B. A. (2005). Beyond bandwidth: Dimensions of connection in interpersonal communication.

Comput.Supported Coop.Work, 14(2), 91-130. doi: 10.1007/s10606-004-8127-9

Neustaedter, C., Brush, A. J. B., & Greenberg, S. (2007). A digital family calendar in the home: Lessons from field trials of LINC. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2007, Montreal, Canada. 199-120. doi:

10.1145/1268517.1268551

Neustaedter, C., Judge, T. K., Harrison, S., Sellen, A., Cao, X., Kirk, D., & Kaye, J. (2010). Connecting families: New technologies, family communication, and the impact on domestic space. Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA. 363-366. doi: 10.1145/1880071.1880152

O'Brien, J., & Rodden, T. (1997). Interactive systems in domestic environments. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 247-259. doi: 10.1145/263552.263617

Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). Designing for dynamic family structures: Divorced families and interactive systems. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Aarhus, Denmark. 151-160. doi: 10.1145/1858171.1858199

Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J. (2011). Teenagers and their virtual possessions: Design opportunities and issues. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 1491-1500. doi: 10.1145/1978942.1979161

O'Hara, K., Harper, R., Unger, A., Wilkes, J., Sharpe, B., & Jansen, M. (2005). TxtBoard: From text-to-person to text-to-home. CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, OR, USA. 1705-1708. doi: 10.1145/1056808.1057002

Osborn, A. F. (1965). Applied imagination : Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving (3.

rev. ed. ed.). N.Y.: Scribner.

Pangaro, G., Maynes-Aminzade, D., & Ishii, H. (2002). The actuated workbench: Computer-controlled actuation in tabletop tangible interfaces. Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Paris, France. 181-190. doi: 10.1145/571985.572011

Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259.

Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (20071231). University–industry relationships and open innovation:

Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259.

Petersen, M. G., Krogh, P. G., Mortensen, M. B., Møller-Lassen, T., & Mortensen, D. H. (2010).

Collective interaction by design collective controllers for social navigation on digital photos.

Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, Reykjavik, Iceland. 353-362. doi: 10.1145/1868914.1868956

Petersen, M. G., Lynggaard, A. B., Krogh, P. G., & Winther, I. W. (2010). Tactics for homing in mobile life: A fieldwalk study of extremely mobile people. Proceedings of the 12th International

Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Lisbon, Portugal.

265-274. doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1851600.1851646

Petersen, M. G., & Lynne, B. (2001). Methodologies for designing future household technologies.

OIKOS Workshop, 47.

Petrelli, D., & Whittaker, S. (2010). Family memories in the home: Contrasting physical and digital mementos. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 14(2), 153-169. doi: 10.1007/s00779-009-0279-7 Philips daylight window concept. (2007). Retrieved, 2012, from

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lRlp61jMpY

Pirhonen, A., & Sillence, E. (2009). Getting connected: At what cost? some ethical issues in mobile HCI IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/jmhci.2009070102

Pisano, G. P., & Verganti, R. (2008). What kind of collaboration is right for you? Harvard Business Review - LA English, 86(12), 78.

Pruitt, J., & Grudin, J. (2003). Personas: Practice and theory. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences, San Francisco, California. 1-15. doi: 10.1145/997078.997089 Raffle, H., Ballagas, R., Revelle, G., Horii, H., Follmer, S., Go, J., . . . Spasojevic, M. (2010). Family

story play: Reading with young children (and elmo) over a distance. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 1583-1592. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753563

Rainwater, L. (1966). Fear and the house-as-haven in the lower class. Journal of the American Planning Association - LA English, 32(1), 23.

Rangaswamy, N., Nair, S., & Toyama, K. (2008). My tv is the family oven/toaster/grill: Personalizing tv for the indian audience. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video, Silicon Valley, California, USA. 19-22. doi:

10.1145/1453805.1453810

Rapport, N., & Dawson, A. (1998). Migrants of identity : Perceptions of home in a world of movement.

Oxford: Berg.

Rasmussen, E., Østergaard, P., & Beckmann, S. C. (2006). Essentials of social science research methodology. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.

Redström, J. (2006). Towards user design? on the shift from object to user as the subject of design.

Design Studies, 27(2), 123. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2005.06.001

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), pp. 155-169.

Rodden, T., Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Koleva, B., Humble, J., \AAkesson, K., & Hansson, P. (2004).

Between the dazzle of a new building and its eventual corpse: Assembling the ubiquitous home.

Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, Cambridge, MA, USA. 71-80. doi: 10.1145/1013115.1013127

Romero, N., Markopoulos, P., Baren, J., Ruyter, B., Ijsselsteijn, W., & Farshchian, B. (2007).

Connecting the family with awareness systems. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 11(4), 299-312. doi:

10.1007/s00779-006-0089-0

Ross, P. R., & Wensveen, S. A. G. (2012). Designing behavior in interaction:<br />Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design. International Journal of Design, 4(2)

Ross, P. R., & Wensveen, S. A. G. (2012). Designing behavior in interaction:<br />Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design. International Journal of Design, 4(2)

In document Homing Interactions (Sider 159-193)

RELATEREDE DOKUMENTER