2. Theoretical background
2.5. Elaboration of the Framework
Here above many theories have been described, but an original framework will be then created to describe the possible outcomes and the importance of packaging change in regards with the brand preference and the brand relationship. The Customer-‐Based Brand Equity provides the possibility to measure the impact of these marketing activities. In fact, in every level of its pyramid it is possible to see and then evaluate a variation, either positive or negative, of a component. I have interpreted this model associating a concept to every level:
1) Who are you? Which means what is the brand in term of salience and awareness for the customers. Here the packaging tends to fulfil a fundamental role: a more recognizable packaging will have more possibility to have a strong awareness in consumers mind, in comparison with a plain or non-‐well-‐identifiable packaging. In the case of Bellavista, it has differentiated its wines from the competitors and from one to another; before the transformation most of the bottles were almost the same, the labels had just a slightly variation of colours and some wines where confused one with an other, some case reported that after the change consumers were more aware of the entire product line whereas before they were thinking that Bellavista was producing just 2-‐3 types of sparkling wine, instead of 7.
2) In this stage the question proposed is: What are you? This brings to many facets of the research and it’s an essential part of the framework. Here the question asks customers what is the brand in their imagery, what is the performance of the brand. In few words, it is the total set of images that they associate with the brand and the rating in terms of performance.
During this step we have some theories to put in and mix:
Brand user image, which is the image of the typical user of the brand, held in the mind of customers. It concurs to form the brand personality, defined as the set of human characteristics that consumers link with a brand. Furthermore, this imagery part of the brand has to be related with the customers; this is where the self-‐concept theory starts. In our case we are more interested in the actual self, which is the totality of the perceptions that the individual has about himself. But this is not the end, it is not worth to just measure the self concept, we need to seek for the level of congruence between the brand user image/the personality of the brand and the actual self image of the consumer. In this stage it is located the first study, a survey, of the research which seeks to measure the level of congruence of customers image and Bellavista different images.
3) The question in third rung of the pyramid is: What about you? This is explained in the feelings and in the judgement that the consumer has towards the brand. In this stage we have the first outcome measuring the first real and relevant result of the packaging change; here the attitude towards the brand would possibly change in terms of preference, defined as the brand that the consumer favours in his consideration set. In this part of the research we are searching for the effect of the packaging change on the feelings and the judgements of customers; this is the step where they concretely form their preference and where there are first signs of modification in the brand relationship. This will be evaluated in the first study of the research, in conjunction with the measure of the actual self-‐image congruence.
4) In this last level, Resonance, the question is: What about you and me? In this part all is concentrated on the relationship that the customer has with the brand. Here is important to understand the degree of attachment to the brand and the level of activities that they have with products; understanding the relationship in this way will help to evaluate the importance of the brand in the customer’s life, the real impact of marketing activities on his mind and heart.
The attention will be posited in particular on the effect of the packaging change. Thus, we go deeper and deeper in the feelings that the consumer holds toward the brand, trying to unveil outermost effect on the bonds that they hold. In sum we are looking for the real response of the customers in the dialogue between them and the Brand. The qualitative method that will be employed is the one to one in-‐depth interview. Following the work of Fournier on brand relationship, the respondent will be asked to describe their usage history situation of the brand. The figure below shows the elaboration of the Customer-‐based brand equity pyramid;
in every level I have substituted a theory of the framework in order to permit the evaluation of the influence of packaging change.