• Ingen resultater fundet

View of Conceptualising Sound

N/A
N/A
Info
Hent
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Del "View of Conceptualising Sound"

Copied!
3
0
0

Indlæser.... (se fuldtekst nu)

Hele teksten

(1)

www.soundeffects.dk

SoundEffects | vol. 2 | no. 2 | 2012 issn 1904-500X

Birger Langkjær & Iben Have Editorial

Birger Langkjær Associate Professor

Department of Media, Cognition and Communication Copenhagen University

Denmark bilang@hum.ku.dk

Iben Have Associate Professor

Institute of Aesthetics and Communication Aarhus University

Denmark ibenhave@imv.au.dk

(2)

– 2 –

SoundEffects | vol. 2 | no. 2 | 2012

issn 1904-500X editorial

Sound studies covers a vast area of different fields within art studies, architecture, musicology, film and media studies, perceptual psychology, anthropology etc. This not only means that sound has no natural ‘home’, but also that sound is conceptu- alised in various ways depending on the concepts, methods and approaches that traditionally define each area of study. Sound may be considered a musically struc- tured art form that one must listen to carefully, disturbing and unhealthy noise in urban environments that must be reduced or part of mass communication that must either be critically analysed or studied as meaningful entertainment. Sound can be described in physical terms, in formal terms and in more (inter)subjective terms, depending on the academic interest. It is not possible to define a common language, a lingua franca, spoken by all researchers and practicians of sound. This may seem regrettable. On the other hand, such a language may not even be desir- able, since we can benefit from the present polyphony, which keeps sound studies connected to and integrated with all kinds of academic and artistic practices. In other words, it is both a challenge and an advantage: a challenge because we need to be updated on sound studies in all kinds of areas, and an advantage because it makes sound studies more than just an esoteric subject area. As sound researchers and practitioners we have a natural need for interdisciplinarity, and we have to maintain an ongoing dialogue about sound across many different fields of study.

This issue of SoundEffects opens with Emma Tornborg’s ‘Sound and stasis in pic- torial poetry’. It aims at explaining the effects of the representation of sound in poetry in relation to temporality and imagery. It is shown how verbs can create not only movement, but also a sense of time, including stasis or a sense of timeless- ness, in the form of a frozen mental image. The importance of mental images is sup- ported by experimental results from cognitive science and investigated in a short analysis of poems by Gustafsson, Tranströmer and Hillbäck.

In ‘Conceptualising the audiobook experience’ Iben Have and Birgitte Stougaard Pedersen combine media studies and comparative literature in considering the audiobook as a medium that gains from being auditory rather than written, from being read with the ears instead of the eyes, to such an extent that it may no longer be considered just another variant of a written literary practice, that is, as a remedi- ation of the printed book. It is an entirely new way of experiencing in which mobil- ity plays a constituent role. The audiobook is not only different from the traditional book in terms of the four modalities suggested by Elleström (material, sensorial, spatiotemporal and semiotic), but also in terms of the typical listening situation that combines aural fiction and movement through social space.

In ‘Urban sound design – can we talk about it?’ Nina Hällgren sets out to sketch a different approach to sound and urban design than the traditional method of noise mapping, which is mainly concerned with quantitative measures of Db and ideas of good (low Db) sounds and bad (high Db) sounds. She argues that a more fine-graded

(3)

– 3 – issn 1904-500X

SoundEffects | vol. 2 | no. 2 | 2012 editorial

scale concerned with qualitative aspects of sound is needed in order to make urban spaces more acoustically varied and vibrant. How this can be done is then demon- strated in a project undertaken by the author, using several complementary meth- ods to map qualitative sonic differences within a specific urban area.

Budhaditya Chattopadhyay’s article ‘The cinematic soundscape: conceptu- alising the use of sound in Indian films’ considers three different periods within Indian cinema related to both technical features and practices of sound recording and presentation in cinemas. The first period is characterised by location sound and monaural reproduction. In this phase, the sound – although part of a fiction – seems to document the film’s location and space. In the second period, many films are presented with stereophonic audio effects, thereby trying to emphasise emo- tional aspects of the sound experience. Finally, the third phase is a return to ‘synch’

sound, but the sound is digitally remastered as surround sound that gives rise to a new conception of cinematic space.

Tina Hanssen investigates the use of low volume microsound in artworks by composer and sound artist Miki Yui in ’Please, do not turn up the volume’, which means to educate listeners on audio aspects of everyday life. These sounds make it difficult to perceive differences between the artwork and the sounds of the gallery, thereby giving rise to misperceptions. This is exemplified in two works, Mamogato and Out in the Dark, which deal with combinations of familiarity and unfamiliarity, creating an auditory imagination and memory.

In ‘A museological approach: radio as intangible heritage’ Christian Hviid Mortensen studies the challenges that come from bringing ‘intangible forms’ such as radio into the space of the museum, which traditionally deals with material objects on display. An exhibition is both information and a narrative that organises this information for the user. Through the concept of ‘affordance’ it is considered how both intrinsic and extrinsic factors can influence user behaviour and this is exemplified in the design of a radio exhibition, ‘You are what you hear”.

Finally, the issue contains two reviews. Birgitte Stougaard reviews Neumark, Gibsons and van Leeuwen’s VOICE – Vocal Aesthetics in Digital Arts and Media, and Nico- lai Jørgensgaard Graakjær reviews Taylor’s The sounds of capitalism. Advertising, music, and the conquest of culture.

Together and separately these articles – as well as the reviewed books – are examples of how different theoretical and practical traditions are brought together to describe, analyse and discuss the conceptualisation of sound. Welcome to the third issue of SoundEffects!

Referencer

RELATEREDE DOKUMENTER

Pinch and Bijsterveld define sound studies as a field involving ‘acous- tic ecology, sound and soundscape design, anthropology of the senses, history of everyday life,

Addressing a number of key concerns – sound and phe- nomenology, sound and the ethics of spectatorship, sound and the experience/intensifi cation of confi nement, sound as

So how does this apply to the use of sound? How can sounds be interpreted as ‘sound signs’? Take the example of the ticking sound of a clock. Its relationship to its object can

Based on a number of pilot studies in AUH-Psychiatry investigating how special playlists and sound equipment can be used by hospital patients and administered by hospital

Section three deals with two examples that may be classified as sound poetry in a broader sense: Thomas Kling’s poem broaches the issue of sound in its con- tent and vocal

Environmental context is also framing Jennifer Lucy Allan’s article ‘Foggy notion: Sound and weather, and the intermingled senses’, in which she convinc- ingly explores the effect

This article has argued that technologically-mediated ASMR – in the form of videos on YouTube – is capable of establishing a sense of presence and intimacy through sonically

The rising prominence of interactive media and technologies has brought about an increased scholarly interest in participatory phenomena. This issue of SoundEffects aims to put