• Ingen resultater fundet

Find the Five Differences

N/A
N/A
Info
Hent
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Del "Find the Five Differences"

Copied!
1
0
0

Indlæser.... (se fuldtekst nu)

Hele teksten

(1)

Find the Five Differences

We humans are quite adapt at identifying things that do not conform to our perception of established norms. To experience this, study the images below. Use the image on the left to form a baseline of normality. Then carefully

Towards Secure Intelligent Buildings

process the image on the right to identify all five differences. You might call this a game, but if the task were completed by a computer it would be called unlabeled anomaly detection using semi-supervised learning.

Anomaly-based detection is originating from network intrusion detection systems. These systems follow an approach similar to the one you used on the images above to classify network traffic as either normal or anomalous.

As technology increasingly is being integrated directly into our homes and houses, the base for intelligent building environments are growing rapidly.

We propose to utilize the advances from network intrusion detection systems in intelligent buildings by implementing anomaly-based detection.

Surveillance cameras are used to monitor the flow of people in the building, the patterns in movement and the habits of the inhabitants.

This data is processed to establish the baseline of normal activity. Any deviations from this baseline could indicate illegitimate access or hostile reconnaissance.

We are implementing anomaly detection using live sensor information from a public building. We conjecture that implementing anomaly detection enhances the security of the intelligent building.

Working with live data motivates an unsupervised and unlabeled learning approach. To achieve this, artificial intelligence techniques, to analyze the sensor information, are being explored.

Unlabeled anomaly detection systems are based on the rationale that normal activity in the data greatly exceeds the potential malicious activity. Another assumption is that the attack patterns are distinguishable from normal patterns in a suitable feature space. This paradigm is known as one-class classification.

These two assumptions are valid for traffic in networks, and we conjecture they are equally valid for traffic in smart environments.

Graphs in Computer Graphics, Image and Signal Analysis Rutsker, Bornholm, Denmark Mads Ingerslew Ingwar, ming@imm.dtu.dk

Referencer

RELATEREDE DOKUMENTER

Then we look at cubic graphs 1 and planar triangulations: We first find a bound on the number of acyclic orientations, which we use to prove the Merino Welsh conjecture on

We used the proposed evaluation criteria in order to evaluate the picked fault detection approaches and we saw how they affect a fault detection approach in terms of

In this paper, we hypothesize that fusing temporal anomaly detection scores (based on trajectories) with spa- tial anomaly detection scores (based on SoTA methods) in- creases

To make a partnership with the purpose of implementing a project regarding building improvements and energy saving in the.

In order to gain insights into the mechanisms of the germanate anomaly, we have constructed a structural model using statistical mechanics and topological

To prevent such setbacks, we propose a physics-informed spline learning (PiSL) approach based anomaly diagnosis mechanism to distinguish between both events using minimal data for

Using machine learning principles, such as fltering and feature selection, we developed the system for the Detection of Cognitive Distraction using EEG for Car Drivers

Given the urgent need to evaluate environmental plastic pollution, here we present preliminary results from detection of microplastic particles in liquid samples using flow