General rights
Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.
You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain
You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Mar 25, 2022
Orientering om projekt: "StorageUtsira"
Grohnheit, Poul Erik
Publication date:
2009
Link back to DTU Orbit
Citation (APA):
Grohnheit, P. E. (Inviteret forfatter). (2009). Orientering om projekt: "StorageUtsira". Lyd og/eller billed produktion (digital)
StorageUtsira StorageUtsira
Orientering om projekt: "StorageUtsira"
Møde om FENCO og CCS Energinet.dk , 4. marts 2009
Poul Erik Grohnheit Risø DTU,
Systems Analysis Department Roskilde, Denmark
A l i f t ti l d t f t f CO2 i th Ut i Analysis of potentials and costs of storage of CO2 in the Utsira aquifer in the North Sea
Objectives
• Provide stakeholders with a detailed overview of the national and regional costs, benefits and bottlenecks of carbon capture and transporting and costs, benefits and bottlenecks of carbon capture and transporting and storing CO2 into the Utsira formation.
• Developing a modelling tool within the framework of the continued model development on the basis of the Pan European NEEDSTIMES model
development on the basis of the Pan European NEEDSTIMES model and/or national MARKAL/TIMES models.
Partners
• Insititute for Energy Technology (IFE)
• Universität Stuttgart, Institute of Energy Economics d th R ti l U f E (IER)
• and the Rational Use of Energy (IER)
• Risø DTU
• Utrecht Universiteit Utrecht Universiteit
• King's College London
Storage Utsira S b goals Storage Utsira – Sub goals
• Improved knowledge on uncertainties and limitations to use the Utsira Improved knowledge on uncertainties and limitations to use the Utsira Formation as a CO2 reservoir (capacity, user conflicts, leakage problems etc).
I d k l d t t ti lt ti d b i (b th
• Improved knowledge on transportation alternatives and barriers (both technical and political/economical) including possible synergies and conflicts for constructing an international CO2 pipeline network.
• Coordinate analysis of CCS for the countries around the North Sea
(Norway, Denmark, Germany, the Netherland and the United Kingdom) for the time period 2015-2050
the time period 2015 2050.
• Analysis of techno-economic parameters of future carbon capture
technologies and their impact on CCS market penetration, considering
lt ti b d ti
alternative carbon reduction measures.
• Develop experience using the TIMES model for infrastructure development
leading to an identification of a set of possible stepwise developments. g p p p
Storage Utsira Project str ct re Storage Utsira – Project structure
WP 7
Coordination and project management Coordination and project management
WP 1 Ph i l d i ti
WP 3 N ti l d lli Physical description
of Utsira
National modelling of CCS pathways
WP 2
Modelling of CCS and scenario development
WP 4
Regional analysis at North Sea level
WP 6
Final results and conclusions
development North Sea level conclusions
WP 5
CO2 pipeline in the North Sea
Assumptions Analysis Conclusions
WP 3 National modelling of CCS Path a s WP 3. National modelling of CCS Pathways
•
The development of CCS pathways in the North Sea region is the results of combining information on CO2 reduction targets, mitigation technologies, costs, CO2 capture potentials and the capacity and availability of geological reservoirs in each of the countries as well as the storage capacity of the Utsira Formation andth d l t f th i f t t f CO2 t t
the development of the infrastructure for CO2 transport.
•
Standardised data for modelling of the CCS pathways for each of the countries will be developed with WP2. This WP3 aims to implement these standardized data and parameter into a harmonised model based on the modelling tools developed within the IEA Implementation Agreement ETSAP.Tasks
•
3.1. Running existing model:•
3.2. Test of integer features.•
3 3 User interface for data input and reporting of national models3.3. User interface for data input and reporting of national models.•
3.4. National reportingTask 3 1 R nning e isting model Task 3.1 Running existing model
•
The starting point of our analysis is the national MARKAL and TIMES models for the five countries developed by each of the partners involved. T•
These models will be used with harmonised modelling assumptions and scenarios to analyse pathways for CCS for all five countries.Existing models
•
UK – MARKAL family•
The Netherlands –The Netherlands – simplified national CCS modelsimplified national CCS model•
Germany – selected sectors from Pan European Model•
Denmark – selected sectors from Pan European Model•
Norway – MARKAL family Reference from application:• Ref 3. Fidje, A., Energy Scenarios for the Nordic Region Towards 2035, IFE report no IFE/KR/E-2008/001, Kjeller, Norway (Available online from: www.ife.no :publications)
• Ref 14. Grohnheit, P.E., Denmark: Using the IEA ETSAP modelling tools for Denmark. Risø-R-1656, Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Risø-R-1656, 2008.
Risø projekter edr TIMES Risø projekter vedr. TIMES
•
NEEDSN E E t liti D l t f S t i bilit R h St 2
New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability, Research Stream 2a:
“Energy systems modelling and internalisation strategies, including scenarios building”.
EU 6th Framework Programme 2004 08 EU 6th Framework Programme, 2004-08.
•
ETSAPDanish participation in IEA-ETSAP, Annex X, 2005-07/Annex XI, 2008-10 EFP 2005 Energi og Samfund/ EUDP 2008
EFP 2005. Energi og Samfund/ EUDP 2008
•
RES 2020Monitoring and Evaluation of the RES directives: implementation in EU27 and
li d ti f 2020
policy recommendations for 2020,
Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE), 2006-09.
•
EFDAEFDA TIMES M d l EFDA-TIMES Model.
European Fusion Development Agreement (EFDA), 2006-08, 2009.
Risø-R-1656 “Using the IEA ETSAP modelling tools for Denmark”
Risø R 1656 Using the IEA ETSAP modelling tools for Denmark ,
NEEDS TIMES Res lts of Pan E ropean Model (October 2007) NEEDS-TIMES – Results of Pan European Model (October 2007)
1600000
Fuel Cell
1200000 1400000
W]
Wave Tidal
Hot Dry Rock Steam Turbine Thermal Photovoltaics Offshore
Onshore
800000 1000000
acity in [MW Onshore Pump Storage
Dam Storage Run of river Fuel Cell
Internal Combustion Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
Steam Turbine
600000 800000
stalled capa Steam Turbine
IGCC
Steam Turbine Generation 4 Generation 2 and 3 Fuel Cell
Internal Combustion Combined Cycle CO2 Seq.
200000 400000
Ins y q
Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Steam Turbine Internal Combustion Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Steam Turbine
IGCC CO2 Seq
0
2000 BAU
2000 CO2
2010 BAU
2010 CO2
2020 BAU
2020 CO2
2030 BAU
2030 CO2
2040 BAU
2040 CO2
2050 BAU
2050 CO2
IGCC CO2 Seq.
IGCC
Steam Turbine CO2 Seq.
Steam Turbine IGCC CO2 Seq.
IGCC
Steam Turbine CO2 Seq.
Steam Turbine
BAU CO2 BAU CO2 BAU CO2 BAU CO2 BAU CO2 BAU CO2
Source: Markus Blesl, IER Stuttgart. CEEH Workshop Roskilde, 6 February 2008
UK Carbon capt re & storage (CCS UK: Carbon capture & storage (CCS
Technical storage potential and relevant costs from
DTI (2005) The role of fossil fuel carbon abatement Technologies (CATs) in a low carbon economy (Authors: Marsh G, Pye S and Taylor P)
Constraints are imposed to limit captured-carbon from power and other p p p sectors using annual and cumulative storage bounds
O&M cost Storage sources Annual Capacity Capital cost O&M cost
Fixed Variable MtC/year £M/MtCO2 £M/MtCO2/year
Near shore gas 5.46 (2010 - 2050) 26 0.6 0.22
Offshore oil and gas 5.45 (2010)
10.91 (2020 - 2050)] 34 0.6 0.22
Offshore aquifer 5.45 (2010)
10.91 (2020 - 2050)] 44 1.1 0.22
UK Decarbonisation of Po er Sector (CO2 red ction 40 90 %) UK: Decarbonisation of Power Sector (CO2 reduction 40-90 %)
2,500
Electricity generation mix Storage
1,500
2,000 Solar PV
Marine Imports
Biowaste & others
1,000 1,500
PJ
Biowaste & others Wind
Hydro Oil
500
Nuclear Gas CCS Gas -
2000 35-B 35-CFH 35-CLC 35-CAM 35-CSAM 50-B 50-CFH 50-CLC 50-CAM 50-CSAM
Coal CCS Coal
• Power sector is decarbonised by three technologies/resources
• Small cost differential between Coal-CCS, Nuclear and Wind
10
,
• Rising electricity production – linkages to buildings and transport sectors
GeoCapacit GeoCapacity
•
Assessing European capacity for geological storage of carbon dioxide – the EU GeoCapacity project•
Exchange of data with GEUS - Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland is required in the contract with the Danish research programme for finansing this projectjGeoCapacity
•
EU 6th Framework Programme•
EU 6th Framework Programme•
Co-ordinated by GEUS - Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland•
25 partners•
Database on CO2 storage sites•
Assessment of CO2 storage capacity in most European countriesSamarbejde med GEUS / GeoCapacit Samarbejde med GEUS / GeoCapacity
Kotrakt med ForskEL:
•
”Projektet er godkendt under forudsætning af, at GEUS - De Nationale Geologiske Undersøgelser for Danmark og Grønland inddrages i projektet med henblik på dataudveksling.”Vigtigste emner for samarbejdet
•
Harmoniserede beregninger med GeoCapacity Decision Support SystemHarmoniserede beregninger med GeoCapacity Decision Support System (DSS) – Neele et al., GHGT-9, November 2008.•
Storskala CO2 lagring i Vedsted-strukturen i Vendsyssel – Frykman et al.GHGT-9 November 2008 GHGT 9, November 2008.
Næste projektmøde 16. marts 2009 – Skype konference.
